Should we be talking about ... Jeff Luhnow?

[Marshmallowmilkshake]

Joel Sherman sure does seem to think we should be, with some kinda sorta disclaimers mixed in there.



https://nypost.com/2021/10/18/jeff-luhnow-a-risky-potential-mets-option-with-others-declining/https://nypost.com/2021/10/18/jeff-luhnow-a-risky-potential-mets-option-with-others-declining/



I'd rather keep looking. It sounds like the Astros won games but had a horrible culture, even if you take out the cheating.

[MFS62]

4) concerned about the general dysfunction that swirled around the Mets.

Wouldn't it be the job of the new person to turn that around?

The candidate they would want wouldn't see that as an obstacle, but as a challenge.



Later

[Edgy MD]

He kind of loses me at "hell."

[Benjamin Grimm]

Even if you can get past his tarnished record with the Astros, there's still the fact that his name is Jeff.

[Willets Point]

So he's basically saying "embrace the dysfunction!"

[Edgy MD]

Benjamin Grimm wrote: Even if you can get past his tarnished record with the Astros, there's still the fact that his name is Jeff.

Yeah, but he makes it work for him.



[fimg=550]https://cdnmarquee.comicskingdom.com/system/blog/feature/999/Family_Circus_v.20190714-8of9.jpg[/fimg]

[ashie62]

Billy Beane has come to resemble Pat Sajak.

[Benjamin Grimm]

.





Yeah, well, he's no Brad Pitt.



http://leaptoad.com/mets/covers/2021/20211019_NYDN_02.jpg>