Kinda, but it's unfair to clump deGrom in with them because he was better than all of them, in terms of raw career numbers and peak. None of them had 13 straight years of peak-quality success, even if it was stunted at points. None of them averaged nearly 11 Ks per frame for their career. Tiant was a compiler who didn't compile enough, Gooden's run of true dominance lasted about 3 years, Etc. etc. I would say the closest comp is Santana, because his case is based almost entirely on peak without bookends, which is kind of what deGrom's dealing with right now. I'd say the best Hall comparison outside of Koufax might be Dazzy Vance, who was also a late-bloomer (a bit later than deGrom) who rattled off a skein of strikeout-heavy seasons in his 30s.
But you cannot compare deGrom to anyone, really, because he's that unique a case.
60 WAR isn't the bar, 60 WAR is the lazy bar for people who want to look at one number instead of putting the brainpower into actually analyzing a player's case.