="SteveJRogers"]Hell, I even have a problem with how the retired numbers are displayed! Again, they are (and always have since the early 80's when 37 and 14 were first slapped on the walls) banking on fans knowing exactly who wore 37, 14 and 41, as well as why there is a red 42 with a blue border and no pinstripes. But its the blind leading the blind if the person you ask has no clue about Met history, or has no knowledge of what number Casey, Gil and Tom wore If I go to Fenway or Yankee Stadium or any other stadium other than Shea and I look at the retired numbers displayed at those ballparks, I may not know what player belongs to what number and why. Their names and statistics are not displayed along with the numbers. In fact when I see stadiums that have their immortal players faces and pertinent stats splashed all over their outfield walls (Atlanta, Los Angeles) I think it looks like crap. Displaying the numbers and nothing more is a classy and understated way of honoring an athlete. I like it and have no problem with it. If someone at the game is curious and wants to know who 37, 14 and 41 are and why 42 is displayed differently, they can ask me. Or they can ask the people around them. I don't like the idea of my team pandering to the casual fan so much. I understand that they want to draw people in to fill the seats. I tolerate the bush league inbetween inning activities and the scoreboard inciting the crowd to cheer because I realize that the team wants everyone to have a good time whether they pay attention to the game or not. But how about leaving the stuff that matters to the real fans of the game that truly appreciate it?