Sure enough about the defense. Going by old-fashioned errors Reyes owns Ramirez, even though Reyes is assuredly no stud himself. But if defense is 15% of the game (or was it 10%?, I'd still take Ramirez if I had no emotional attachments.
AG/DC wrote: ="KC"]'nother half inch and it would have grass stains on it. The number of times chicks have said this to me. Dammit I wanted to respond to that one.
This Pelfrey guy might be pretty good. 5/31, 7 IP, 2 ER, W 6/5, 6 IP, 1 ER, L 6/11, 8 IP, 1 ER, W 6/16, 6 IP, 6 ER, W 6/22, 3 IP, 0 ER (after 3 innings)
He really managed the heck out of Game 1 of the 2006 NLDS. He really fucked up Game 2 of the 2006 NLCS. So long Willie. I feel bad that they did you this way, but maybe it had to be done.
attgig wrote: So, when are we going to trade for Griffey? Seems like we need another injury prone OF'er because we can't get enough of em. Maybe we can convince Shawn Green to resign with us? sick of these moves. Ridiculous statement. We are short on major league hitters. We just got one for basically nothing. Be happy.
I don't feel it's his fault that the starting lineup on Friday featured Easley, Tatis, Schneider, Chavez. But it is his fault that Cancel saw action. I'm stumped at this point.