Benjamin Grimm wrote: batmagadanleadoff wrote: Fail. Maybe. Whatever. Once again, Schaefer is not meant to be a scientific way of evaluating player performances. It's just for fun, a revival of something from the 1970's. Or... you can think of it as a cumulative stat. Colon led the team in Schaefer points, just like he did in innings pitched. Sure, deGrom had a better year, but you wouldn't give him the Innings Pitched title, would you? Kinda harsh Bats. This is done for fun. And make-believe beer. IMO Colon does deserve it. He was here to anchor the staff, win hopefully half his games, and put those innings in his belly. He did all that plus led the team in wins. I agree deGrom deserves more but Colon does not deserve less. And as said, if deGrom had made his last start he could have pulled a Goliath and won it. For a fun thing that rewards imaginary beer I think it's fairly reflective of those players seasons. And Duda had to work for that end burst he made for himself. I bet this is as reflectively accurate as the actual contest was back in the day, maybe more so.