Ceetar
-
Posts
25,313 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis
New York Mets Videos
2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings
New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors
New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources
2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Ceetar
-
bmfc1 wrote: Wayne noting Evans has hit for the cycle in his last four AB (he must be reading my Twitter) Ceetar is #1! http://twitsetters.com/ yeah, I saw that. Not sure why exactly I get credit with setting that trend.
-
Wayne noting Evans has hit for the cycle in his last four AB (he must be reading my Twitter)
-
Gwreck wrote: Gameday says Duda was hit by a pitch immediately following Wright's homer. For those who are actually watching -- anything we should know, or just a pitch that got away? Howie/Wayne didn't mention it. Kendrick's been a bit wild too. Possible though.
-
Benjamin Grimm wrote: Maybe they know who their callup is going to be, but logistically they can't get him to the ballgame for today's game. And off tomorrow.
-
Gwreck wrote: You missed the point on several levels: 1. Playing shorthanded is stupid 2. Paulino has a toe problem and may also be hurt 3. We need bullpen help desperately etc Not really. Every team plays shorthanded pretty frequently. That's why Nickeas was added. We didn't lose a reliever, and presumably wouldn't add one for Hairston.
-
Gwreck wrote: Niese to DL, Nickeas up. Rubin reports that Hairston isn't on the DL yet. What, they can't be bothered? Bay, Pagan, Duda should be the outfield everyday anyway. Might as well actaully make sure they need to DL him.
-
John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote: For some reason they are not DLing Hairston till tomorrow? If I understand it. Also, Ronny Paulino may have a broken toe. Also, Mike Pelfrey pitches today. Also, Nickeas is called up. Getting an MRI for Hairston today, so no DL, although what's the big deal right? He's freaking Scott Hairston. Or maybe it's that the Bisons will complain if they don't have anyone to play the OF.
-
Benjamin Grimm wrote: Rather low Metly quotient, though. Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to have Seaver, or Strawberry, or Gooden, or Wright, or Mookie? Or any of about two dozen others? Gooden was once photographed with a Coke can. instantly disqualified.
-
Frayed Knot wrote: Get your misery early today. Mets will have several new and/or re-cycled faces on the team by then (at least we hope they will) so that's something to look forward to ... I guess. Odds on today's DL assignee will be posted later. day game means I'll be at work and can't have a beer while watching.
-
Benjamin Grimm wrote: I can understand why Piazza is on this graphic, but Eddie Murray?? Does he work for Pepsi or something?
-
John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote: metirish wrote: Niese to the DL per Rubin, Mets will need two starters for next week, for Niese and for the DH Rubin also says. He collapses like clockwork in August. That said, thought it strange when he led off an inning trailing 5-0. sounds like it's still "Likely DL" but I guess I'd be surprised if it wasn't Carrasco starting for Niese. Although probably should've let him finish this game to 'stretch him out' if that was going to be the case. Actually, I forgot about Misch. I always forget him. I wouldn't mind seeing Cohoon either.
-
Edgy DC wrote: I certainly don't think there's any intention to "unload" Beato. not off the team, no. But there's plenty of speculation about him being a Bison.
-
Schaefer POTG 08/23/2011 Philadelphia 9, Mets 4
Ceetar replied to Benjamin Grimm's topic in New York Mets Talk
Evans 3 Duda 2 Turner 1 Thole 1 Parnell .5 Byrdak .5 -
Edgy DC wrote: Two questions: When did this guy become our best reliever?Has he earned a return trip with a big-league contract and stuff? Given that they have to reload the entire rest of the bullpen except Parnell and perhaps Carrasco (contract) and maybe Beato, I'd say yes. I don't think it's worth the effort of trying to find another LOOGY, who's basically going to be either slightly worse or slightly better than Byrdak for slight more or less money.
-
That stupid protrusion in the LCF wall make it impossible for Victorino to play Evans ball off the wall. He had no idea which way it was going to bounce. I guess people don't complain about the outfield walls when you're winning?
-
metirish wrote: This is beyond hard to watch. Absolutely horrible. Brooklyn Oktoberfest helps.
-
Frayed Knot wrote: Doesn't help matters that this also happens to be 'Bloop one in front of our Outfielders' week. and somehow Turner and Evans both smack the ball but it stays in the park.
-
Ashie62 wrote: Long tossing programs for Niese, Gee and Pelfrey next spring. All three are finished for 2011. This is far from true. I actually expect them all to have some bounce back in September. Not so confident in Capuano, but he may be shuffled aside for Schwinden. Also, there still lingers a small chance of Santana.
-
I'd probably be the second or third best player on the Mets if they signed me tomorrow.. geeze.
-
Frayed Knot wrote: Do you suppose we can keep the combined score of this series under 30-0 ?? would be 27-0 if they just forfeited. Guess the umps didn't get the memo though.
-
Snarky Schaefer comments (split from POTG 8/22/11)
Ceetar replied to Vic Sage's topic in New York Mets Talk
-
Mets undefeated post-earthquake. Angel Pagan � CF Ruben Tejada � SS David Wright � 3B Lucas Duda � RF Jason Bay � LF Nick Evans � 1B Josh Thole � C Justin Turner � 2B Jonathon Niese � LHP interesting lineup. I kinda like it.
-
Frayed Knot wrote: Ceetar wrote: Actually, it's looking more and more like the Mets won't be risking a draft pick this year. I prefer they sign a type A pitcher, but I'm not sure it's wise to spend type A money on another pitcher either. Signing a 'Type A' FA still costs teams finishing in the bottom half of the standings a draft pick, the difference is that it's a second rounder instead of a first. well true, but the ~55th pick is a big difference than the ~15th. (and of course there's that talk of changing those rules) Certainly not enough to stop you if you really need a player. I'm not sure the Mets needs trend towards signing what's type A anyway though C.C. would certainly be an interesting sign, but of course he's going to get more and longer than he wants. Although I'm tired of saying "That's a horrible contract, it'll bite them near the end" and not having it bite yet. Meanwhile our "It may bite us in the end" contracts trended towards biting in the middle. (or beginning in Bay's case.)
-
Actually, it's looking more and more like the Mets won't be risking a draft pick this year. I prefer they sign a type A pitcher, but I'm not sure it's wise to spend type A money on another pitcher either.
-
Benjamin Grimm wrote: Do we want Fielder to come to the Mets? I'd rather stay committed to Ike Davis, although I'm becoming a bit worried that his leg may never be what it was. Moving Ike to the outfield doesn't seem wise if there's a chance he might be gimpy. In the broad sense of "wouldn't it be cool to have Fielder on our team" yeah. logistically it does get a little more difficult.
