I mean, the gist of this seems to be: Male sports writers think locker room access is crucial. Sure, some women may get harassed a bit, but it's not bad and much better than it used to be. In the end, hanging out with naked dudes gives me insight, and that makes me a better writer. I don't get what the problem is with the nudity. They're adults and professionals and the writers at least, are formally educated. Doctors and nurses see naked people all the time. And the majority of nurses are females. We're a prudish and sexually immature society and that needs to change and the way to change that is not by removing women from the locker rooms or restricting them. If there's harassment going on in the locker room, I would imagine that the thing to do is to eliminate the harassment instead of banning women reporters from the locker rooms. Cocks and nipples. Big fucking deal. nobody's banning women from the locker rooms, we're banning non-employees, period. It's a damn locker room, not an interview room. If you're so bad at your job that you need to trap a player at his locker. If the only time he'll talk to you is when his pants are literally around his ankles, maybe you're not so good at your job. And if talking to the media is so important, why are we relegating it to 'gotcha' moments when they can't run away? Will some avoid a more casual 'media area' even if that's where all the snacks and drinks are? probably. But guys avoid the media now too. You're just giving them the dignity of not having to blow you off (half) naked while they're literally doing something else. Don't make it a "media area" though. Maybe it a clubhouse. just pull out the locker room stuff. Put the chairs, the boombox, the food, the foosball and PS4,the beer in the clubhouse and all the clothes and showers in the locker room. it's not hard. giving the players a few minutes of private time to be human isn't the end of sportswriting.