Vic Sage wrote: In all seriousness... see, that's the problem. Why shouldn't it be a serious notion that the Mets sign Cole? I mean i know why its not, but $$ is not an acceptable answer for a NYC franchise with a mid-market budget. For the record, I think the Mets should sign Cole, re-sign Wheeler, sign Rendon, and trade Syndergaard to the Red Sox for Mookie Betts (and if they have to include Smith or Davis too, fine). yeah, fine. but seriously... The Mets "core" are all young and under team control. The only big contracts that will still be on the books after next season are Cano and Degrom. There is absolutely no budgetary reason they couldn't replace Wheeler with Cole. But we react to that reality by saying "not only Cole, but we should keep Wheeler, and get Rendon and Betts too!" (a trio which would bust even a Yankee budget) as if a contract for Cole is similarly preposterous.