One day to go in the voting, so it seems about time for some brain-bending "here's how I'm voting" columns. Hey, you, the cheery guy in the corner! Jeff Pearlman, step on up! And disagreeing with a markedly superior pal, too? Sure! But, alas, Joe�s still right�perhaps Jeff Bagwell never used. Perhaps, as dozens upon dozens of his teammates turned to steroids and HGH throughout the 1990s and early 2000s (Reality: No two teams in baseball had more PED connections than the Texas Rangers and the Houston Astros), Bagwell looked the other way and continued to pop his GNC-supplied Vitamin C tablets. Maybe, just maybe, that happened. But, as the game was being ruined in his very clubhouse, where was Bagwell�s voice of protest? Where was Jeff Bagwell, one of the best players in baseball, when someone inside the game needed to speak out and demand accountability? Answer: Like nearly all of his peers, he was nowhere. He never uttered a word, never lifted a finger (Now, once he retired, he was more than willing to defend himself and speak up for the sport. Once he was retired). This, to me, is why we are allowed to suspect Jeff Bagwell and, if we so choose, not vote for him. The baseball players have cast this curse upon themselves�A. By cheating (And the usage of PED was, factually cheating. I don�t care how often you say, �It wasn�t outlawed by baseball� blah blag blah blah. In the United States, the obtaining and usage of HGH and steroids without a proper perscription is illegal. And �proper perscription� does not merely mean one given by a doctor. It means one rightly given by a doctor for a necessary medical condition); B. By not standing up against cheating and doing everything to assure a clean product. If he did use, Jeff Bagwell deliberately sought an advantage over other players�an illegal advantage. If he didn�t use, Jeff Bagwell, stood by and watched his sport morph into WWE nonsense. So, again, Joe�s right: Statistically, Jeff Bagwell is a Hall of Famer. And, on a personal note, he was always an approachable and nice guy. But, dammit, thanks to baseball�s meekness (for lack of a better word), Hall of Fame voters (I�m not one, for the record) have the right to suspect anyone and everyone from the past era. They have the right to view muscles suspiciously; to question a guy putting up six-straight 100-plus RBI seasons in the heat of PED Madness; to wonder why�when, oh, 75 percent of players were using�one extremely succesful, extemely large, extremely muscular man wouldn�t. Did Jeff Bagwell use PED? I don�t know. Do I have the right to hold his era against him? Damn right I do. My head's full of fluid already, so I don't know where to begin with this one. Except, you know, to point out that he should probably take things in a less Glenn Beckian direction next time out. I mean, good gravy. Great googily moogily, what a line of shit. So, the guy who doesn't get a vote wouldn't vote for the guy who had no public forum accusations of PED use, because he didn't do enough to condemn his friends and coworkers who were cheating? By the way (let me digress), this style of writing (the constant insertion of parentheses) is not only inane and distracting (well, duh!) but also a sign of an inferior intellect (OH SNAP).