Edgy MD wrote: Oh, yeah. Give in to the mystery, man. They can appoint Grady Little's perpetually confused younger brother, and he still comes in 0-0, without any "See you tomorrow" freakouts on his record — certainly not in a Mets locker room. I personally wouldn't care if they teased it out through the new year. I know it affects offseason player negotiations, so sure, you've got to make the hire ASAP and move on. But in the meantime, as far as I know, until they hire somebody, the next manager is John J. McGraw with a better sense of humor. Mickey didn't work out, but I still applaud the boldness of the hire. The next skipper could be a fart in a spacesuit, but he or she gets to put his or her name on a Mets era and it will stay there as long as there is a Mets. That's always cool. I'd stipulate to "interesting," or "mild fun." But in the era of shifts-called-from-your-laptop, pitching-changes-dictated-from-the-assistant-GM, dugout stewardship really ain't what it used to be. Does a managerial hire really affect player acquisition/negotiations much?