The problem is that no time-of-year switcheroo is going to solve the issue that most upsets fans: that when one of their players is injured during the WBC it's seen as an injury that wouldn't have occurred if not for the WBC. It's a vastly over-played assumption of course even if Olbermann claims otherwise ("first Freddie Freeman, now Diaz"). OMG! a strained hamstring for FFF, that's never happened in ST before. I mean, sure, top draft pick/top prospect Chipper Jones broke his ankle on a slide in the final ST game and missed the entire season of what would have been his rookie year, but why not just cherry pick only the data which you feel buttresses you pre-determined conclusion. In the season after that first WBC injuries to a WBC participant that were occurring in August were being treated as a no doubt cause-and-effect so maybe we can look forward to more tweets following Lindor's stubbed toe injury this coming July. Now was Diaz's snapped tendon caused by a celebration unlikely to happen in a regular Wednesday night ST game? Sure. But it was also a fluke occurrence unlikely to happen anywhere. But back to the whole timing thing. I think November is going to be a non-starter for players (not to mention TV networks during the heart of NFL/college football season). Players need and want a break at the end of the regular season. By November the playoff team players are just shutting things down and are the non-post season guys going to want to ramp it up for a short tourney (with a lot of travel) after a month off as we get toward holiday/vacation time only to shut it down again before ramping it back up once more just after the holidays? Not a chance in my mind. And, even if we ignore all that, the games that would be played in a November tourney are, unlike the current set-up, ones that wouldn't be played otherwise. Every pitch thrown, every slide made would add to the yearly total. As it is now, these games are just a different version of what the players are doing anyway. Mid-season? I don't see how that works. The season lasting from mid-April to early October is already stretched to late-March/early November. How many more bad weather games do we want to create? And this Still doesn't get rid of the issue if and when a player gets hurt during the WBC, in fact it only means that his down time is more likely to occur during a more crucial time of the season. The only argument for it is the assumption that injuries will be less likely in July than in March, something I'm not sure is true and is unlikely to be backed by hard data. The current set-up has pitch counts which increase towards the end in the same way that more informal team ones do as ST moves along. And the players on these teams know ahead of time that maybe they need to get ready a bit earlier. Other than that, we're talking about a tournament which involves somewhere between four and seven games played for a couple dozen ML players two or three times a decade. That's not exactly a lot of added risk if you ask me. Don't like the whole idea of a WBC in the first place? That's fine. I could either take it or leave it but prefer to keep it in just as an added perk to the usual irrelevance of March baseball once every few years and as an attempt to grow interest in the game in some marginal baseball countries. But, if keeping it, I'd strongly argue that it's currently in the best spot on the calendar possible.