Most of the noise being made in favor of an international draft is done in the name of the weaker/poorer clubs. But the kicker is that those clubs don't neccesarily want the "help" and are often the ones against such a draft. What those teams see in outposts like the DR & Venezuela is the ability to be entrepenurial and proactive by beating the bushes in order to give themselves a shot at the next unknown gem, or at least a handful of good players with a chance to develop. Houston was big on this by being one of the first into Venezuela and mined a bunch of ballplayers no one else had seen like Bobby Abreu, Johan Santana, Richard Hidalgo and others -- (they just needed help knowing which ones to hold onto). Those teams know that they're at a disadvantage for the few big-ticket guys from the Carribean or Asia, but they're more or less OK with that in exchange for the freedom to scout the bushes for the rest of the talent. Look at it this way; No one would go turning over every rock for raw talent if they knew there was only a 1-in-30 shot at signing him, and there are those who think that including Puerto Rico in the draft (late '80s sometime) helped dry up the talent coming off that island for that very reason.