="Benjamin Grimm"]I still don't know what they're going to build in the area around Citi Field after Shea is gone, but hopefully you'll be able to see some outside urban architecture from within the ballpark. Real, pre-existing buildings would be better, but there just aren't any. (I love what they did with that old building in San Diego's stadium.) I don't see how you'll see much of anything from inside except maybe from higher levels. First of all it'll be completely enclosed without Shea's open-gapped OF. And while those OF seats, scoreboard, advertising and such won't be as high as the back end of CitiField is now to Shea, I still doubt the field-level folks will be able to see out. Upper deckers might get a view out, but the new joint is to face more towards the north than the current ENE which means essentially towards Flushing Bay, or, more accurately, the highway ramps between the stadium and Flushing Bay. Which might make for a good view for some but it's probably not going to involve any architecture other than what can be done with a paving truck. Most buildings, including whatever replaces the 'iron triangle' area, are to the west and away from the seats. As far as the wind issue goes, it's all speculatiion at this point. The numbers say that Shea has traditionally been very tough on RH power while slightly helping HRs towards RF. The theory being that the winds - particularly in early season and other bad weather days - come in from the N & NE directly into the open end and knock HRs down. Except that the scoreboard tends to block those coming in from RCF while those coming in unblocked from LCF swirl around the bowl before going out towrds RF. So theoretically, CitiField is now there to block virtually eveything and make it a better HR park in '08 than we're used to seeing. Whether that's actually going to happen or not or whether two games prove that it's not the case is still all just conjecture.