Delgado is not in the top 20 in OPS. He is not a good fielder, he has no speed. He is not, or at least should not be, a legitimate MVP candidate. Trying to decide what a player's contributions mean to a team is garbage. Even if you could figure it out, the deciding factor is not anything that player did, but what his teammates did. A guy who hits three home runs and drives in 5 does nothing different whether his team wins 5-4 or loses 11 to 5. The only difference is what his teammates have done...so it makes little sense to base an individual award on the performance of your teammates. The MVP, Cy Young and Rookie of the Year awards should look at individual performance and nothing more. Sports writers resist this because they don't want their votes to be decided simply by looking at park-adjusted OPS...which is almost all that needs to be done. They want to make it seem more complex, something only a knowledgeable sports fan would understand, so they can feel good about the importance of their job. But all it does is fuck things up and they end up making idiotic choices that even the casual fan can spot as foolish.