But the idea that they need to sell because their players will be facing stupid questions is a weak position. I don't think he was saying that at all. It reads to me like two separate observations: 1. He thinks the Wilpons will ultimately have to sell the team. (That's my guess too, but only time will tell.) 2. This is going to be distracting for the players (and the broadcasters.) For posterity: New York Daily News wrote: Tim McCarver thinks there is only one way for Mets ownership to extricate itself from the financial squeeze it is in. "It's agonizing. I personally feel the Wilpons have to sell the ballclub," McCarver, Fox's No. 1 baseball analyst, said Tuesday during a conference call. "I don't see how they can escape by selling a minority position, particularly when they don't allow any control." McCarver, who worked behind a Mets TV microphone for 16 seasons (1983-1998), said the financial plight of the team will weigh on the players until it is resolved. "It's deplorable. I would not want to be a player on the Mets right now," McCarver said. "Not because they are not talented enough, but because of all the questions surrounding the team this year will be (about) the off-field problems. It's very difficult to play under those circumstances." On the field, McCarver said he can't see the Mets doing much. "But if they finish second or a close third (in the NL East) it wouldn't surprise me as far as their talent on the field," he said. "However, they are going to be asked questions about these off-field matters all year, every place they go." McCarver said the Mets' TV broadcasters, SportsNet New York's Gary Cohen, Ron Darling and Keith Hernandez, will be under pressure too. "It's very difficult to broadcast under those circumstances. That's just because you have to tell what you deem to be the truth," McCarver said. "It can't be a soap opera about the owners every day and I'm sure Gary, Keith and Ron will keep it between the lines."