Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Benjamin Grimm

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    43,454
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

 Content Type 

Profiles

New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings

New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors

New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources

2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Benjamin Grimm

  1. Maybe. But every vibe I'm getting (not that I have an infallible vibe meter) says that the Mets have little to no interest in bringing Pagan back next year.
  2. G-Fafif wrote: The article mentions concerns by the Phillies about chemistry. If that's real, then eph them. They're as dumb as Gary Matthews and Shane Victorino if they don't glean the joy from Jose. But eph them, mostly. If they're saying they're concerned about chemistry, I suspect that they're really concerned about money and don't want to broadcast that too much. I don't know how many more times they can go to the well, especially since they may be paying Ryan Howard $25 million to sit out much of 2012.
  3. I can guarantee the number of suitors for Jose Reyes will be somewhere between zero and 18. I'm guessing three or four teams will be seriously involved. If health concerns hold them back from going over five years and going over $20 million per, then the Mets have a shot. But if there's a team willing to go all Crawford on him, then he's gone. I'll be sorry if he goes, but having survived the loss of Seaver and Strawberry and others, I know I'll be able to move on.
  4. It may be true. And I think that article would be different if Jose had played 156 games in 2011 instead of 126. Those two DL stints just have to be worrisome. I'd be very surprised if they didn't end up costing Jose millions of dollars.
  5. Hmmm... maybe the Mets can bring in a veteran retread to compete for the job in the spring with Nieuwenhuis. If Nieuwenhuis wins the job, the vet stays as a reserve outfielder. And if not, Nieuwenhuis goes back to Buffalo. I can see "Nieuwenhuis" being the trickiest Schaefer name since Mientkiewicz.
  6. So who's the closest-to-ready center fielder in the system? I don't get the sense that there's anyone who will be ready to step in for Angel Pagan as early as next April, so they'll probably need to bring in a guy for at least one year. But I wonder if it's possible that the Mets might have a homey starting in center field in 2013.
  7. Last time we tried that, we all read the same book (Frank Thomas' Kiss it Good-bye) and nobody had anything to say about it! http://archives.cranepoolforum.net/index.php?ThisForumID=21&ThisMonth=2006-1 http://archives.cranepoolforum.net/index.php?ThisForumID=21&ThisMonth=2006-2
  8. Bizarre, ain't it? I thought I had left this thing in better condition than that! I'll have to take a fresh look. Last time I tried it, answering the Mr. Wright question correctly got you registered, but unable to post. Now, well, it's simply a way to make you feel good about your ability to answer a basic question. Not that that's without value, but it falls quite a bit short of the mark. Sheesh.
  9. To be fair, we've made it very difficult for them to follow up. And solving that is still on our to-do list!
  10. I agree. Long overdue.
  11. You were invited because of your little robot friend.
  12. No, that was someone else.
  13. There are numerous similarities. You're not the only one who has made that mistake.
  14. Question for those of you who've joined in the last few years: How'd you find us?
  15. It's worse than you think! You actually listed eleven pretty shitty years endured. I can't be convinced, however, that 2006 was a bad year. Bad ending, yes, but not a bad year.
  16. The rail seems to be set back a bit behind the orange line. I think an outfielder will be able to steal a homer, but he might bump his glove on the railing. I take it, though, that you're talking about the super-dramatic catch where the outfielder hoists himself onto the fence and then reaches deep into home run territory to make the catch. It does look like the railing would prevent that.
  17. If there's anything that bugs me, it's that I let myself have the impression that 2011 would be the one "punt" year and that the Mets would be ready to go to town in 2012. I don't know if that was my own faulty assumption, or if I got that impression from the Mets. I think it's the latter, but like I said, I'm not certain.
  18. Here you can really see the difference between hitting above that red Modell's sign and clearing the top of the new fence.
  19. I don't think they're going to "give up completely." I think they'll make the team as good as they can, within their current constraints, and hope that they catch some breaks, and if the team is competitive going into the summer, they'll buy up. Do I think their best team will be good enough? No, I think it's unlikely. But I wouldn't call it "giving up completely."
  20. Ashie62 wrote: OF is still Bay Pagan Duda INF Wright Tejada Turner Davi c Thole Thats a punt folks. Really? The Mets have finished their offseason moves? Already?
  21. Wait... is he saying that Cloris Leachman is not a player?
  22. My 10-year-old daughter tells me that the tallest man in the world is a Mets fan, and he lives in Poland. I don't know if this is true, but I'm sharing it here anyway.
  23. The part that John Mitchell didn't say: "I wish I had that ring so I could sell it on eBay and pay a few bills."
  24. I think five years, $90 million is the high end of the reasonable zone. And I also think it's reasonable for the Mets to not go above that until they find that they have to.
×
×
  • Create New...