Yes, but why does that approach so frequently fail? I can't think of many specific examples right now, but I'm pretty sure I've seen the same thing happen with other teams. This year's Blue Jays, perhaps. Why is it that adding three or four all-stars doesn't make your team better? My best guess is that it's because generally these star players you add are past their 30th birthday, and by then there's a greater chance that they're in decline. But Vince Coleman was only 30 in 1992. Bret Saberhagen was 28. Bobby Bonilla was 29. Eddie Murray was 36 and Willie Randolph was 37. In 2003, Tom Glavine was 37, Roberto Alomar was 35, Mo Vaughn was 35, and Cliff Floyd was 30. I would say that it wasn't unreasonable to think that the 1992/93 group should have improved the team. Obviously, it didn't.