Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Skipping deGrom  

16 members have voted

  1. 1. Skipping deGrom

    • It's NUTTY! — Biggest game of the year and they bump the guy who was their best pitcher up until 10 days ago for a washout who has fallen to AA!
      1
    • It's QUESTIONABLE! I mean, he's been bad twice in a row, sure, but if your alternative is Montero ...
      1
    • WHATEVER! Seriously, dude, whatever.
      5
    • It's DEFENSIBLE! It could blow up in their faces, in fact it probably will. But you understand why they may feel they have to try something. And if you're going to take a big gamble, you might as well do it on the day Fernandez pitches.
      8
    • It's the RIGHT MOVE! The way deGrom is throwing, he can't help us, and we've got to get him right for the stretch run! It's more than this game! And Montero looks like he may have totally found himself!
      1


Recommended Posts

Posted


I'm having trouble with this decision. It's courageous. It can even be called strategic — I mean when was the last time you think Miami looked at a Rafael Montero scouting report? But how do you justify replacing an all-star quality pitcher with a guy from AA whose career has been tumbling down hill for two years? The word most folks would use is crazy.

[fimg=350]http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1703937.1393522944!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/gallery_1200/rafael-montero.jpg[/fimg]


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


All five answers work for me, so I'm taking whatever...


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


I'm squarely in the "whatever" camp. I don't know enough facts to say whether it makes sense or not but I would suspect that they wouldn't be "skipping a turn" unless they felt they really had to.


Posted


I'm on team DEFENSIBLE!

I think skipping deGrom makes sense. I just wish they had a better alternative than Montero but maybe he'll surprise everyone. In another thread I predicted (tongue-in-cheek) that he'd throw a one-hit shutout. I guess I was thinking of Aaron Heilman in 2005...


Posted


It's DEFENSIBLE
They cited mechanical issues and potential fatigue as reasons, as well as pointing the second wind he's had following short rests in the past.
And, after 13 runs and 25 hits over 2 starts/9 innings, it's not like you can just turn your head and say 'eh, it's just [crossout:clzq37em]one[/crossout:clzq37em] two of those things'.


Guest themetfairy
Guests
Posted


I was between Whatever and Defensible. If Jacob needs rest, Jacob needs rest. And we don't have too many options at the moment.


Guest cooby
Guests
Posted


I think it's a stupid idea. What's it going to accomplish?


Posted


cooby wrote:
I think it's a stupid idea. What's it going to accomplish?


Hopefully it'll keep him from having a third disaster game in a row.


Posted


Shit, they dodged a laser guided ordinance.

How strange that control was this guy's ticket to the big leagues, lack of control was his ticket back to the boonies, and he comes back up, walks six in five innings, but still keeps the other team off the board. I'm going to mark that one down as "not repeatable," but I'll sure take it.


Posted


They should have skipped deGrom again.
He's either throwing it down the middle or walking guys. He's probably bewildered, too.


Guest cooby
Guests
Posted


Vic Sage wrote:

He's either throwing it down the middle or walking guys. He's probably bewildered, too.


Why I don't they should be skipping him. How's he going to work things out on the bench?


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


cooby wrote:
Vic Sage wrote:

He's either throwing it down the middle or walking guys. He's probably bewildered, too.


Why I don't they should be skipping him. How's he going to work things out on the bench?


yeah, the extra rest and days might actually have messed him up more than anything else, barring an actual pending physical injury.

It'd be nice of the defense could occasionally bail him out of course, but at this point a healthy Cabrera's better, but otherwise it's probably a tossup between deGrom and d'Arnaud on who's the best defender ( per his position) on the field.


Posted


But he did pitch better. It would be hard not to, but he did, certainly. The walks were partially a result of some squeezing.

A little offense in the first seven innings yesterday would have gone a long way. He'd have left with a lead, and gotten the front half of the bullpen working for him instead of the back half and the same performance would have been framed as a meaningful step forward.


Posted


Vic Sage wrote:
They should have skipped deGrom again.
He's either throwing it down the middle or walking guys. He's probably bewildered, too.


I hope that's kinda what it is -- that he has mechanical problems, rather than being fatigued and needing some rest. Because history sez that pitchers that are kinda run down in September don't recover that same season, even with extra rest.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Vic Sage wrote:
They should have skipped deGrom again.
He's either throwing it down the middle or walking guys. He's probably bewildered, too.


I hope that's kinda what it is -- that he has mechanical problems, rather than being fatigued and needing some rest. Because history sez that pitchers that are kinda run down in September don't recover that same season, even with extra rest.


like Jacob deGrom, who struggled last September...
..and then pitched some great postseason games.

Granted, a lot of that September struggle was luck whereas this August he's been a little more wild. It's just not always easy to see what's fatigue and what's just a little out of whack.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Mets expected to announce health issue for deGrom shortly, twits say.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Post says inflammation and will miss a syart. Terry still mum.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Shit like this is exactly what erodes trust.

Why lie/obscure? If he's hurt, he's hurt. If not, then, he's not.


Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Shit like this is exactly what erodes trust.

Why lie/obscure? If he's hurt, he's hurt. If not, then, he's not.



Tell it bro. The lyin Mets


Posted


Montero is listed as the starting pitcher for Binghamton today.
Why isn't he up with the big club? Five scoreless innings in his last major league start wasn't good enough to fill in if DeGrom (or Matz) can't go?

Later


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


The Mets great young rotation seems to be wearing out pretty fast. I would prefer they protect the young arms for the future, rather than risk further injuring them. When pitchers pitch with pain, discomfort, or mental doubts regarding their arm health, they are often prone to altering their motion and mechanics to avoid the discomfort, which can lead to ineffectiveness or further injury.


Posted


MFS62 wrote:
Montero is listed as the starting pitcher for Binghamton today.
Why isn't he up with the big club? Five scoreless innings in his last major league start wasn't good enough to fill in if DeGrom (or Matz) can't go?

Later

DeGrom can go. Matz has already been replaced in the rotation. DeGrom doesn't need to be.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...