Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Geez what a disrespectful obituary. I was half-goofing when I wrote about him but that 16 years ago and I assumed he was alive and well.

It was a longtime goal of mine to one day interview Jeff but didn't know where he'd wound up and figured I would always have time.


Posted


Yeah, that was some truly bitter Bitter Bill.

Wake up and realize it's the last word on the guy. Don't make the story be about you.


Posted


Might have curbed the instinct to identify a just-deceased person's career as "lousy".


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


That is, unquestionably, the worst and most insensitive obituary I've seen. I'm saving this to be used as an example for my journalism students.

Not sure if you saw the news, but Jeff McKnight, a Met who wore about 10 different numbers during a pretty lousy career with the Mets and Orioles, died Sunday at 52 due to leukemia, a disease he was battling for 10 years.


Even if this was a feature about a perfectly healthy 52-year-old Jeff McKnight, that would be rough. Guy played six years in the majors. That's a dream come true for a lot of people. A story like that is the kind of thing that gives reporters in general and sportswriters in specific a bad name.

And how many editors signed off on that?

That reads like a drunken caller on a sports talk radio show.

The Associated Press did a more professional job:

BEE BRANCH, Ark. (AP) Jeff McKnight, a versatile player who spent six seasons with the New York Mets and Baltimore Orioles, has died. He was 52.

McKnight's family told the Mets that McKnight died Sunday after having leukemia for 10 years. His father, Jim, who briefly played for the Chicago Cubs in the early 1960s, was born in Bee Branch.

Jeff McKnight made his big league debut in 1989 with the Mets and hit .233 overall with five home runs and 34 RBIs in 218 games. He singled in his final at-bat, for the Mets in August 1994 on the final day before a players' strike wiped out the rest of the season.

McKnight was mostly an infielder, and played every position in the majors except center field and pitcher.

McKnight hit his first big league home run off Jack Morris, an eighth-inning shot that helped rally the Orioles over Detroit at Memorial Stadium.


Posted


With the state of journalism as it is, I'm going to guess the number of signoffs was somewhere between zero and one. And that one may have just been a copyeditor.

I wrote Price and asked him to pull it and do a re-write.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Bill's job is to come off like an unedited hack.


Posted


Jeff McKnight made his big league debut in 1989 with the Mets and hit .233 overall with five home runs and 34 RBIs in 218 games. He singled in his final at-bat, for the Mets in August 1994 on the final day before a players' strike wiped out the rest of the season.


I wonder how many players never saw the bigs again after the strike, and how that would compare to a typical season. did ownership blackball anyone? did marginal guys decide they needed to move on with their lives and get real-world jobs sooner then would typically happen?


Posted


I assume that last bit is at least partially true. But Baseball-Reference lists 140 players and 82 pitchers as having played their last game in 1994, but significantly greater figures are found in 1993 (178 and 84) and 1995 (187 and 104).


Posted


Anyone who makes it to the big leagues and contributes - as McKnight did, over a a few years -- cannot be described as lousy.


Posted


What a horrible obituary,what a hack.

thankfully took some heat for this, not that he gives a damn



Posted


Well the obit might have been unnecessarily nasty and disrespectful but at least 'Bitter Bill' doesn't admit to being a drunken heckler or anything.
Oh wait, he does that too.


Posted


Bitter Bill's slight gets more offensive every time I think about it.

Here's what I wrote on "John wants to talk sports with you" on Facebook, and it covers my feeling:

RIP Jeff McKnight. You were a Big Leaguer.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Damn shame, ten years is a long battle.
Oh, and fuck you Bill!


Posted


Revisiting JCL's groundbreaking work on the McKnight of Many Numbers, it is amazing how cavalier Charlie Samuels was in passing along 17 and 18 in particular so soon after their best days. 5, too, I suppose, though I guess Davey Johnson was deemed persona not grata ASAP. Whatever one's feelings on digit-retirement, how does the guy from Tidewater keep rating prime numbers?


Posted


G-Fafif wrote:
Revisiting JCL's groundbreaking work on the McKnight of Many Numbers, it is amazing how cavalier Charlie Samuels was in passing along 17 and 18 in particular so soon after their best days. 5, too, I suppose, though I guess Davey Johnson was deemed persona not grata ASAP. Whatever one's feelings on digit-retirement, how does the guy from Tidewater keep rating prime numbers?


Charlie probably [rolls eyes in disbelief and mock sarcasm] forgot that those numbers belonged to Keith and Straw. [/rolls eyes in disbelief and mock sarcasm]

[fimg=433]http://mbtn.net/images/torve-second.jpg[/fimg]


Posted


Been looking at the All-Time Numerical Roster, and it seems it has been a thing since way before Samuels was ever in charge of such things:

I.e. #36 used by the Wayne Twitchells and Danny Boitanos of the early 1980s Mets. #7 found its way onto John Christensen after Hubie Brooks took it over from Ed Kranepool. #45 bounced around in between Tug McGraw and John Franco and while one would expect Zach Wheeler to be its custodian for a while it has gone through Jason Isringhausen and Justin Hampson since Pedro Martinez took it from Franco, etc.

While #8 was never as much of a hot potato as #17 was, it still made the rounds before the unofficial retirement since Carter got inducted into Cooperstown. The only two numbers (well, technically three, but with the above photo of Kelvin Torve and subsequent Rickey Henderson usage, Mays' 24 has been used) that were given the "NOBODY WEARS THIS EVER AGAIN" treatment without the official retirement have been #41 (only Seaver wore it from his debut through its official retirement) and #31 (hasn't been reissued).

While its safe to assume using McKnight's distinction was meant to be yet another "dig" at the Wilpons' perceived lack of caring about Met history, the fact is, unless the former wearer was a no doubt future HOFer, the Mets have historically never really gave a flying fuck about numerical legacies.


Posted


SteveJRogers wrote:
... the fact is, unless the former wearer was a no doubt future HOFer, the Mets have historically never really gave a flying fuck about numerical legacies.


You nailed that one.


Posted


batmagadanleadoff wrote:
SteveJRogers wrote:
... the fact is, unless the former wearer was a no doubt future HOFer, the Mets have historically never really gave a flying fuck about numerical legacies.


You nailed that one.


Although, I see that 17 hasn't been issued since mid-2010, five years ago. That can't be a random coincidence, I'd suppose.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Mark Johnson.


There's one five between Mark n Dave. Still, that's impressive ... remembering Johnson as #5. What was he a Met for, like 15 minutes? Okay, I exaggerate., but MJ's stint couldn't have been more than a few months.


Posted


batmagadanleadoff wrote:
batmagadanleadoff wrote:
SteveJRogers wrote:
... the fact is, unless the former wearer was a no doubt future HOFer, the Mets have historically never really gave a flying fuck about numerical legacies.


You nailed that one.


Although, I see that 17 hasn't been issued since mid-2010, five years ago. That can't be a random coincidence, I'd suppose.


Hernandez has been working the broadcast booth as a regular though for a lot longer, even before SNY, so if anything it might be a case of "OKAY KEITH, WE GET IT! FINE! INTO UNOFFICIAL RETIREMENT IT GOES!" since he has said on the air how certain players didn't look right wearing #17. But yeah, that, #8, #31 and #24 are the only 1-50 numbers that haven't been been used since that point.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...