Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


That's summazing. Not that I didn't think he was a tool, but....

Now they're paying a scofflaw money that should be going to the fat and kinda coldhearted Prince Fielder.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted (edited)


Whither goes the MVP award?


Edited by Guest
Posted


Ashie62 wrote:
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Whither goes the MVP award?


Matt Kemp..howya doin!!!!


Nothing changes IMO.
The BBWA - who are the ones in charge of the award, not MLB - has shown no inclination to change things when past winners have later turned up dirty and I'd be shocked if they did anything in this case.

Braun is, of course, protesting his innocence but, absent any wild discoveries of bad tests or other such irregularities, he simply sits out the first 50 games of next season and everything goes on as normal.
This testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio, which is where Braun's test failed the standard, is the same thing that tripped up cyclist Floyd Landis a bunch of years back. And, like Landis, the excess testosterone in question has reportedly been shown to be not his - ie, synthetic - and therefore an indicator that it was not only over the limit but also that way specifically because it was added to his body.
Tough to argue your way out of that one.




think the award goes to Suzette Charles.


OK I'm lost on this one.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted (edited)


Whither goes the MVP award?


Matt Kemp..howya doin!!!!


Nothing changes IMO.
The BBWA - who are the ones in charge of the award, not MLB - has shown no inclination to change things when past winners have later turned up dirty and I'd be shocked if they did anything in this case.


Yes, but a positive test following the season-- hell, during the postseason-- with the results received during the same calendar year... that's flat-out unprecedented.

... the excess testosterone in question has reportedly been shown to be not his - ie, synthetic - and therefore an indicator that it was not only over the limit but also that way specifically because it was added to his body.


Three words: Axe body spray.


Edited by Guest
Posted


seawolf17 wrote:
Maybe everybody can drink a cup of shut the fuck up about Reyes' batting title now.

C'mon. Reyes was childish and disappointing and whoever was competing for the title against him didn't change that.


Posted


seawolf17 wrote:
Maybe everybody can drink a cup of shut the fuck up about Reyes' batting title now.

Damn right. I'll take "childish and disappointing" over "drug user" any time.


Posted


Ashie62 wrote:
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Whither goes the MVP award?


Matt Kemp..howya doin!!!!


Ken Caminiti got to keep his MVP award well after it was known that he was full of dope that year. They don't care once they give out the hardware.


Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I think the award goes to Suzette Charles.


Hilarious 27 years ago. Still funny now. Perhaps because Grimm, Suzette and I are all the same age.

I saw her open for Bob Newhart at Westbury in 1991 on the night the Mets' illusory winning streak reached ten.


Posted


seawolf17 wrote:
Maybe everybody can drink a cup of shut the fuck up about Reyes' batting title now.


These things aren't graded on a bell curve. One douche move doesn't undo another...


Posted


G-Fafif wrote:
Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I think the award goes to Suzette Charles.


Hilarious 27 years ago. Still funny now. Perhaps because Grimm, Suzette and I are all the same age.

I saw her open for Bob Newhart at Westbury in 1991 on the night the Mets' illusory winning streak reached ten.


I'm glad somebody got the reference! (And yes, I figured it was a longshot.)

And... OMG! I was at that same show! I don't know if it was a one-night only performance; we may or may not have been there on the same night.


Posted


Not for nothing, but seeing as how is reputation is in a thousand little pieces, he'd do well to make a huge conciliatory gesture and personally turn that trophy over to Kemp.


Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
Not for nothing, but seeing as how is reputation is in a thousand little pieces, he'd do well to make a huge conciliatory gesture and personally turn that trophy over to Kemp.


He might want to go through the appeal process first if, in fact, he was wrongly identified.


Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I think the award goes to Suzette Charles.


Hilarious 27 years ago. Still funny now. Perhaps because Grimm, Suzette and I are all the same age.

I saw her open for Bob Newhart at Westbury in 1991 on the night the Mets' illusory winning streak reached ten.


I'm glad somebody got the reference! (And yes, I figured it was a longshot.)

And... OMG! I was at that same show! I don't know if it was a one-night only performance; we may or may not have been there on the same night.


Saturday night, July 13, 1991. Bob did contemporary material on woman drivers and those darn Mexicans.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
Not for nothing, but seeing as how is reputation is in a thousand little pieces, he'd do well to make a huge conciliatory gesture and personally turn that trophy over to Kemp.


Then after Kemp gets caught...


Posted


Interesting reading here on the MLB testing process. My favorite snippet:

Each test is monitored closely, from the collection phase to the final administration of testing. When a player is selected for random testing, he is taken to a "clean area" designated in each clubhouse. He is observed urinating in a provided sample cup, which is sealed and initialled. (Observed? Yes, that means what you think. The "full stream" must be visible from player to cup.) That sample is prepared and sent to MLB's designated lab.


This is someone's job, to watch MLB players arc whizz into cups all day. Hilarious.


Posted


Ask Lawrence Taylor how tests can be beaten unless actual whizzing is observed, he used to do it all the time (even though the NFL eliminated steroids from the league decades ago).


Posted


Fman99 wrote:
This is someone's job, to watch MLB players arc whizz into cups all day. Hilarious.




Posted


Braun is appealing, with a statement from his spokesman claiming there are "highly unusual circumstances surrounding this case which will support Ryan's complete innocence."


Any predictions on what the "Highly unusual circumstances" will turn out to be?

The mind boggles at any new angles they might come up with, so I guess they go with the old I-was-doped-against-my-will standby.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...