Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

IGT 5/28/2011: PHI @ NYM -- Rake Over Cole


G-Fafif

Recommended Posts

Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Terry really wearing a path here.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
Terry really wearing a path here.


The root of the word pathetic.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Wishing the running game translated into scores for the Mets like it just did for Philadelphia.


Guest themetfairy
Guests
Posted


Dale Thayer, wearing Number 46, makes his Mets debut.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Sounds like a real good crowd on the radio too.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Let's save some criticism for the offense, Hayne and Wowie.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


We got us an old school losing streak brewing.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


1 and 4 since Fred Wilpon opened his fucking mouth.

Since the high we felt last Friday, 1 and 6.

Three non-pitchers on the team right now are worth a damn and 2 might be gone in two months: Reyes, Beltran and Turner. The other 10 hitters could be waived tomorrow and I wouldn't care.

It's fucking torture being a Mets fan. Yet I'll be back tomorrow.


Posted


were there as many Phillies fans at the game as FOX were saying? , from what they were showing it was a lot.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
The Ibanez one was well-struck.

Like that one. (The regression to the mean for our pen continues.)


No, our pen is still good. This isn't regressing to the mean it's something else entirely.

I mean yesterday was Izzy anad K-Rod, each legtimately talented pitchers and K-Rod probably the best closer in the game right now. a lot of bad defense, bad holding runners on, caving to pressure caving to something. I don't know, but it's ridiculously frustrating. These pitchers are good pitchers. their offense is not a good offense. Both days our pitcher outpitched their 'Ace', and we lost. it's damn well insane. the Mets looked like they were clearly a better team than the Phillies for roughly 14-15 of those innings. This doesn't feel uncommon either, I feel like a lot of times the Mets are cruising along, come undone in one inning, and it blows the whole game. Why do their errors happen with no one on or with two outs, and ours all happen in the most crucial parts of the game? WHY IS THAT?


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Among the errors you can look at was a lefthander like O'Connor letting the tying runner on first jog to second uncontested.

Being better for a period is nice, but leads must be padded. You can't count on a bullpen to pitch perfectly with one run leads every time. The bullpen has picked this team up, but you've gotta pick them up by taking the heat off of them also. Going oh-for-15 or so down the stretch was not helpful.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
Among the errors you can look at was a lefthander like O'Connor letting the tying runner on first jog to second uncontested.

Being better for a period is nice, but leads must be padded. You can't count on a bullpen to pitch perfectly with one run leads every time. The bullpen has picked this team up, but you've gotta pick them up by taking the heat off of them also. Going oh-for-15 or so down the stretch was not helpful.


iNdeed. wasn't try to pin it on any once aspect just that the one place the Phillies are clearly much better than the Mets is the starting pitching. If you neutralize that advantage, you should beat them. No one's perfect, Izzy and K-Rod among them, and not building a freaking lead in either game was criminal. Everything seemed to fall apart at the same time from the pitching to the fielding to the throwing. It's just frustrating to watch, from Murphy failing to put his glove down to Tejada rushing to try to get the guy at second instead of planting and throwing to first.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Ceetar wrote:
The Ibanez one was well-struck.

Like that one. (The regression to the mean for our pen continues.)


No, our pen is still good. This isn't regressing to the mean it's something else entirely.

I mean yesterday was Izzy anad K-Rod, each legtimately talented pitchers and K-Rod probably the best closer in the game right now.


Yes, but neither one of them is going scoreless for a month again. (Especially Isringhausen.)

Ceetar wrote:

iNdeed. wasn't try to pin it on any once aspect just that the one place the Phillies are clearly much better than the Mets is the starting pitching. If you neutralize that advantage, you should beat them.


They're also among the best-- if not the best-- defensive team in the league, top to bottom. And they're fantastic situational hitters-- both PHs and lineup regulars. (I'd be the first to say "SSS," but it's been that way for the better part of the Manuel era.)


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
The Ibanez one was well-struck.

Like that one. (The regression to the mean for our pen continues.)


No, our pen is still good. This isn't regressing to the mean it's something else entirely.

I mean yesterday was Izzy anad K-Rod, each legtimately talented pitchers and K-Rod probably the best closer in the game right now.


Yes, but neither one of them is going scoreless for a month again. (Especially Isringhausen.)


iNdeed. wasn't try to pin it on any once aspect just that the one place the Phillies are clearly much better than the Mets is the starting pitching. If you neutralize that advantage, you should beat them.


They're also among the best-- if not the best-- defensive team in the league, top to bottom. And they're fantastic situational hitters-- both PHs and lineup regulars. (I'd be the first to say "SSS," but it's been that way for the better part of the Manuel era.)



fair enough. Obviously they're not going scoreless for a month, which is why it sucks that their bad inning(s) coincided with a tight game against a divisional opponent. bad luck, or some 'bad team' philosophy where the pitching and hitting don't line up when you want?

Yes, they're good situational hitters, and take the bases when they need them. But we made it easy for them in that regard. 2 outs soft single up the middle for Rollins and we can't get them out? (I would've kept Pelf in, but that's hardly a given or anything) They don't make a ton of errors (although they have been this weekend) but they're not infallible either. We were good defensively for most of this year too, but suddenly we're making errors that they capitalize on and they make errors and we don't. bad timing? small sample size? we hit Oswalt a lot, but a lot of the hits were two outs. 2 two outs hits that don't score a run because they were singles with no one on.

Although I would say while I do really like our bullpen, I'm not real sold on the situational parts of it. I kinda wish Collins stopped using it like that.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...