Edgy MD Site Manager Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 Surprise viewing last night at the Edgy household. I naturally noticed massive plot holes and technical oversights which largely made me appreciate all the more the deft and subtle wielding of a sentimental sledgehammer that obscured them the first time.
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 I was eight when E.T. came out and pretty much hated it thus setting me apart from the great mass of eight year olds who loved it. I also hated Michael Jackson who was big at that time. This pretty much set the stage for my iconoclastic lifestyle and the fact that I never had any friends. Thanks fro bringing up those old wounds Edgy.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 I guess I was 19 when it came out, and I thought it was great.I watched it for the second time about 16 years later, when my son was a toddler. It didn't do much for me. I suppose my heartstrings don't get tugged the same way that they once did.I probably would have given it 4.5 stars then, maybe 2.5 now. I don't know if I should split the difference and vote 3.5, or go with my first (and dated) impression, or my current opinion.Such a difficult situation!
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 I thought it was ok as a kid. Unwatchable when it was released on video several years later. When I was in grade school, the teachers kept telling us that if we screwed up our buddy system, one of us would get left behind like E.T.
metirish Old-Timey Member Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 Frayed Knot wrote:Never saw it.Me neither,the nearest cinema was a good thirty miles away in Clonmel,we never went,in fact I don't think any of my friends saw it either,certainly not when it was in the cinema.We didn't have a VHS/VCR for years so I didn't see it there either.I'm sure RTE showed at Christmas but I can't remember.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 In retrospect, one of the most surprising things about that movie is that there was never a sequel.My guess is that Spielberg resisted. I'm sure the studio would have loved to do an ET 2. I don't remember if there were ever even any rumors about another ET movie.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted July 23, 2007 Author Posted July 23, 2007 There was netbuzz back in 1985 of Speilberg and Drew Barrymore co-producing a sequel, with Gertie being the heroine.
metirish Old-Timey Member Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 Edgy DC wrote:There was netbuzz back in 1985 of Speilberg and Drew Barrymore co-producing a sequel, with Gertie being the heroine.Drew Barrymore was 10,do you mean 1995 or 2005?....
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 Must have been 2005.In 1985 there was no such thing as "netbuzz." The Internet probably had about a dozen users.
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 metirish wrote:Edgy DC wrote:There was netbuzz back in 1985 of Speilberg and Drew Barrymore co-producing a sequel, with Gertie being the heroine.Drew Barrymore was 10,do you mean 1995 or 2005?....Drew Barrymore did a lot of things by the age of ten that most kids never do at that age. I wouldn't put producing a film past her.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted July 23, 2007 Author Posted July 23, 2007 2005.I clearly have no idea what I'm typing anymore.
Guest sharpie Guests Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 Umm..it was ok. Couldn't stand the hype when it was released, saw it just before it left the theaters. Had its moments, but, as often with Spielburg movies, you can see the strings being pulled.
Batty31 Old-Timey Member Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 Don't throw Reese's Pieces at me, but I liked this movie..saw it in the theater when it came out. Alien movies...even cutsey ones..will always have an appeal to me. I guess there is a soft sentimental spot in my otherwise black heart.
dgwphotography Old-Timey Member Posted July 26, 2007 Posted July 26, 2007 I am a sentimental person, and this over-rated tripe left me cold. One vomit-inducing reeses piece.
RealityChuck Old-Timey Member Posted July 27, 2007 Posted July 27, 2007 Just a great movie in all respects. There's nothing wrong with going for the emotions, and Spielberg does is perfectly.
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted July 27, 2007 Posted July 27, 2007 To watch this movie is to see a master craftsman at the top of his game. I'm as cynical as they come, but Spielberg is able to elicit more terror from a set of jangling keys swinging on a belt, more romance from the setting free of frogs in science class, more humor from a drunken alien, more joy from soaring bicycles crossing the moon, and more sheer wonderment and heartbreak from a glowing red fingertip than any other filmmaker of his generation.youse peeps are just plain nuts.
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted July 27, 2007 Posted July 27, 2007 Don't forget the porn version E3: The Extra Testicle.
metirish Old-Timey Member Posted October 19, 2008 Posted October 19, 2008 Finally I watched this today on HBO in HD. Maybe because I have heard so much about it down the years I was expecting something more , it was watchable and certainly darker that I expected . I also thought Drew Barrymore was the main star and was surprised to see it was the boy.3.5 stars from me .
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts