Guest iramets Guests Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Which feat was performed by Steve Trachsel (vs NYY on 6/27/2004), Rick Reed (vs ATL on 04/11/2001) and Brian Bohanon (vs. ATL on 09/26/1997) during their Metly careers that can only be tied but can never be broken? (Other Mets may have done this, probably have, since the list is still being compiled, but these are the only three incidents so far recorded.) Does anyone remember seeing these? It must have been a thing of beauty to behold.For those whose burning curiosity becomes too great the answer is here. (Talcum powder may help with the burning sensation.)
RealityChuck Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 I saw the list last night before seeing the question here, so I'll pass.
G-Fafif Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 I was at that Brian Bohanon game and though it is not relevant to the question, he gave up the first home run to Rafael Belliard anybody had given up to Rafael Belliard in something like 10 years and, oh, a zillion at-bats.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 I think Rey Ordonez hit a walk-off RBI single in the 10th inning in that Reed game.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Whoops, I lied. The Ordonez walk-off was the next night, the 12th. (I was there too).So I guess the trivia isn't about light-hitting shortstops after all.
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Centerfield wrote:It's breakable.Kind of.it can't be broken by a pitcher that starts an inning, but it can be broken by a relief pitcher who comes in with no outs and at least 1 man on base.
Guest Johnny Dickshot Guests Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 It was a double down the line, yes? Won the game 1-zip or sonething.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 It was a single. Down the left field line, IIRC. Won the 1-0 game.The record certainly can be broken. Go to your mouth repeatedly on the rubber and get automatic balls called. Or balk. Put two men on, then throw one pitch for the triple play.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 What I was thinking that there could be an incorrigible pitcher who goes to his mouth on the mound four consecutive times. The batter is awarded a walk even though no pitches are thrown. The next guy hits into a double play. Next guy flies out on the first pitch. 3 outs, 2 pitches.An even incorrigibler pitcher could get away with one pitch by going to his mouth 8 times.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Wow, two posters simltneously typing away about going to their mouths.
Guest ABG Guests Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 9 pitches for three strikeouts can't be broken, right?
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Well, I guess it can if you come in the game in the middle of the first victim's at-bat.
Guest iramets Guests Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Couldn't you go to your mouth 12 times, and then have three successive pickoffs?Every inning? For your whole career?
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 There are two other ways (that I know of) the side can be retired without a single pitch being thrown. Name them.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 You could do the 3 walks via going to the mouth, and then have each batter simply walk back to the dugout instead of the base. They'd be called out once they reach the dugout for abandoning the base.
Guest iramets Guests Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Gwreck wrote:You could ...have each batter simply walk back to the dugout .By hypnotizing them?
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 There's another I guess. The other two don't involve a runner reaching base.
DocTee Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Batter's interference and runner's interference. (Say there were two outs at the time--)
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 I think interference requires a pitch being thrown. The scenarios I had envisioned were:1. Batter switches from one batter's box to the other when the pitcher goes into his motion. According to rule 6.06(, that batter is out. If three particularly indecisive switch hitters were to do this, causing the pitcher to abandon his delivery, the side could be retired without a pitch being thrown.2. A batter steps into the batter's box with an altered bat pursuant to 6.06(d). Even though no pitch is thrown, according to the comment, a batter has "attempted" to use an illegal bat upon stepping into the batter's box with it. If three batters attempt this in a row, and are discovered, the side is retired without a single pitch being thrown.
DocTee Old-Timey Member Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 I think interference negates the pitch, no? If the ball is hit into play it is considered a "dead ball" and the batter/runner called out.
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.