Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

More Stats to Drool (or Puke) Over


Elster88

Recommended Posts

Guest vtmet
Guests
Posted


I think today's game is a good example for the "which is more important, runs scored or OBP" debate...most people argue that OBP is a more important stat, and that a high OBP leads to runs and that a low OBP doesn't...I'm not so sure that Bannister and the Brewers would agree with that side of the argument...Bannister allowed 11 baserunners in 5 innings with only 1 run allowed (WHIP of 2.2, ERA less than 2)...and the Brewers had 17 batters reach base but only 3 crossed the plate (2 of them from a HR)...


Guest Johnny Dickshot
Guests
Posted


All the same I'd prefer Bannister not try that ever again...


Posted


]All the same I'd prefer Bannister not try that ever again...


EGG-Xactly! (see how I got that Easter reference in)

Runs scored may be the more "important" stat but, to a large extent, RS is merely a function of OBP (combined with SLG and a few other things).
In the short run weird things like allowing 2+ base-runners per inning like Bannister did might only result in a scant amount of runs but you wouldn't want to walk that tight-rope too often.
And it's ditto for batters. Reyes might score a bunch of runs w/a lousy OBP but a lot of other things have to go right (good SB pct, good backup hitters) in order for that to happen and, even then, it's almost certain that he'd score even more runs with a better pct.


Posted


vtmet wrote:
I think today's game is a good example for the "which is more important, runs scored or OBP" debate...most people argue that OBP is a more important stat, and that a high OBP leads to runs and that a low OBP doesn't...I'm not so sure that Bannister and the Brewers would agree with that side of the argument...Bannister allowed 11 baserunners in 5 innings with only 1 run allowed (WHIP of 2.2, ERA less than 2)...and the Brewers had 17 batters reach base but only 3 crossed the plate (2 of them from a HR)...


I think yesterday's game was a good example of how great a pitcher Jorge Julio is. He gave up a shot, sure, but he buckled down, got the outs he needed and didn't give up any runs. We should move him to closer.


Guest vtmet
Guests
Posted


Jose Reyes vs Mike Piazza: 0 for 14;
Jose Reyes vs Bobby Cox: 1 for 11;
Jose Reyes vs Nats/Marlins/Brewers/Mirabella: 17 for 52 with 4 walks;

Bobby Cox has always found every Met vulnerability that he can...he knows that one of the keys to beating the Mets is to keep Reyes off of the base paths...

Piazza has had quite an opportunity to see what pitches expose Reyes' vulnerabilities, and what pitches he excels against...

So is it a big surprise that Reyes looks like he's a blind man swatting at flies against Cox & Piazza's pitch calling? Going a whopping 1 for 25 against them?

His OBP against Cox/Piazza: .040;
His OBP against everyone else: .375;


Guest Bret Sabermetric
Guests
Posted


You're assuming Piazza is paying the slightest attention when he's not gripping a bat.

The way to test this kind of thesis out is not to study past examples, whose results are already in, but by studying future examples. If Reyes bats well vs Cox/Piazza for the rest of the year, what would you say then?


Guest Johnny Dickshot
Guests
Posted


Career vs. Bobby Cox: 274/294/414
Career v. Everyone: 275/301/394

I know you're saying Cox has "learned" to exploit his weakness, but the fact that the Cox and Piazza series come in the same week suggests to me it's a normal slump any player is vulerable to.

The visual evidence at hand (lousy swings, butt backing up, bucket-stepping) doesn't suggest the opponent's gameplan is to blame nearly as much as some poor slumpy habits.

But wait and see the rest of the year -- and next, next, next -- for any definitive proof.


  • 2 weeks later...
Guest Rotblatt
Guests
Posted


These aren't necessarily GOOD stats, so maybe this is the wrong thread to post in, but I was having some fun with BP's new customizable stats and thought I'd share.

Mets are:

NL 2006 Batting

12th in OBP: .325
15th in UBB: 68
6th in K's: 161
2nd in SB%: 90.9%
4th in HR: 36
5th in SLG: .443
5th in VORP: 43.0

So we're bad at walking, but pretty good at not striking out. We generate our offense through power and speed. Replacing Hernandez with Matsui and Chavez with Beltran should help our OBP & UBB rates, but if the rest of our players start walking more without sacrificing power, our offense will look as dominant as our pitching.

Pitching
1st WHIP: 1.23
1st H/9: 7.56
9th BB/9: 3.48
1st K/9: 7.87
T4th HR/9: 0.98
1st K/BB: 2.26
7th Inherited Runs Prevented: -1.2 (positive is good)
2nd Bequethed Runs Prevented: 5.7 (positive is good)
1st in VORP: 57.9

Our pitching has been dominant, striking out many and walking few. We don't give up many home runs. Our relievers have done well in stranding runners.

Defense
3rd in Defense Efficiency @ .732

We've converted batted balls into outs quite well.

Overall
1st in current likelihood of reaching the playoffs at 74%.
1st in current likelihood of reaching the playoffs (PECOTA adjusted) at 83%

We've played well while the rest of our division has sucked ass. Absolutely meaningless this early in the season, but I thought it was nifty nonetheless.


Posted


I know, I know, I know, but still.

Hernandez:
11 GS, 102 IP, 48 TC, 23 PO, 25 A, 0 E, 2 DP, 1.000 FP%, 4.24 RF, .767 ZR

Matsui: 11 GS, 91.1 IP, 57 TC, 30 PO, 27 A, 0 E, 8 DP, 1.000 FP%, 5.62 RF, .864 ZR


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Those DP numbers are the most interesting.

Hernandez, I think, turned one of the coolest of the year with Pedro pitching in Washington and me in edgtendance.


Posted


So, if I'm reading Seo's stats correctly, Matsui has (in fewer innings) handled more chances, had more assists, more putouts, and turned more DPs with a better zone rating and range factor than AndyHandy.

But I was told ...


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Top relief ERA in baseball? Mets.

Top overall ERA in baseball? Detroit.

Second-best overall ERA in baseball? Mets.


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


You are all just fooling yourselves. This team is going to fold like a cheap tent in a Northeaster. This short period of success is just setting you up for an even bigger disappointment than usual. You can comfort yourselves with useless satistics and win - loss records all you like, but I tell you there is no way this cheap ass organization of incompetents will ever be anything more than a second rate pretender. You are all being duped out of your hard earned money by an ownership that cares only about extracting as much money from you as they possibly can by fielding a team with the illusion of competitiveness. Consider yourselves warned, this team sucks and your koolaid induced stupor has blinded you to the truth.



(sc=99.9999)


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Michel Abreu:

TeamGABRH2B3BHRRBITBBBSOSBCSAVGOBPSLGOPS
St. Lucie Mets2923100040200.333.333.444.777
Binghamton Mets10414162024242700.390.409.585.994


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


To Bobby? Possibly, but I doubt it. Bobby is a Venezuealn native. Michel is from Cuba.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


I keep telling Michel to come back to earth, but he isn't having it.

TeamFromToGABRH2B3BHRRBITBBBSOSBCSAVGOBPSLGOPS
St. Lucie4/264/292923100040200.333.333.444.777
Binghamton4/295/12145462140393431000.389.414.6301.044
Total4/265/12166382450393831200.381.409.6031.012


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Here's one your can drool over, puke over, or likely dismiss, but the Mets have a pitcher placing first, second, and third in OPS:

1. D Oliver 1.250
2. T Glavine 1.183
3. B Bannister 1.100
4. C Beltran 1.015
5. C Delgado 1.004
6. D Wright .889
7. R Castro .884
8. X Nady .884
9. P Lo Duca .787
10. E Chavez .786
11. C Woodward .717
12. J Reyes .715
13. J Valentin .685


Guest Rotblatt
Guests
Posted


April 2006 (31 K in 39.3 IP) is just the second time since June 2000 (31 K in 39 IP) that Glavine struck out over 30 batters in a month.

September 2005 (34 K in 47.3 IP) is the first time.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...