Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Posted October 11, 2005 In honor of the Chicago White Sox and the Houston Astros, both trying to end years of futility.I'm a little surprised at how far down the first list the Cardinals are.And if not for 1986, look how far down the Mets would be. They'd only be ahead of four teams.Most years without a World Championship1 yearsBoston Red Sox20042 yearsFlorida Marlins20033 yearsAnaheim Angels20024 yearsArizona Diamondbacks20015 yearsNew York Yankees200010 yearsAtlanta Braves199512 yearsToronto Blue Jays199314 yearsMinnesota Twins199115 yearsCincinnati Reds199016 yearsOakland Athletics198917 yearsLos Angeles Dodgers198819 yearsNew York Mets198620 yearsKansas City Royals198521 yearsDetroit Tigers198422 yearsBaltimore Orioles198323 yearsSt. Louis Cardinals198225 yearsPhiladelphia Phillies198026 yearsPittsburgh Pirates197951 yearsNew York (SF) Giants195457 yearsCleveland Indians194888 yearsChicago White Sox191797 yearsChicago Cubs1908Never Won a World Championship8 yearsTampa Bay Devil Rays199713 yearsColorado Rockies199229 yearsSeattle Mariners197637 yearsWashington Nationals (Montreal Expos)196837 yearsSan Diego Padres196837 yearsMilwaukee Brewers (Seattle Pilots)196844 yearsHouston Astros196145 yearsTexas Rangers (Washington Senators)1960Most years without a League Championship1 yearsBoston Red Sox20041 yearsSt. Louis Cardinals20042 yearsFlorida Marlins20032 yearsNew York Yankees20033 yearsAnaheim Angels20023 yearsSan Francisco Giants20024 yearsArizona Diamondbacks20015 yearsNew York Mets20006 yearsAtlanta Braves19997 yearsSan Diego Padres19988 yearsCleveland Indians199712 yearsToronto Blue Jays199312 yearsPhiladelphia Phillies199314 yearsMinnesota Twins199115 yearsCincinnati Reds199016 yearsOakland Athletics198917 yearsLos Angeles Dodgers198820 yearsKansas City Royals198521 yearsDetroit Tigers198422 yearsBaltimore Orioles198323 yearsMilwaukee Brewers198226 yearsPittsburgh Pirates197946 yearsChicago White Sox195960 yearsChicago Cubs1945Never Won a League Championship8 yearsTampa Bay Devil Rays199713 yearsColorado Rockies199229 yearsSeattle Mariners197637 yearsWashington Nationals (Montreal Expos)196844 yearsHouston Astros196145 yearsTexas Rangers (Washington Senators)1960
soupcan Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Posted October 11, 2005 I'm not getting the Red Buttons reference.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Author Posted October 11, 2005 "Never got a dinner."
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted October 11, 2005 Posted October 11, 2005 The comeback of our times:"Twenty-six world championships? Dude, let go of the second millenium already."Also, I'd like to take this time to send a thumbs-down to Senator Chuck Shumer for this press release. I'm glad, I guess, that the Mets won Schumer some wine, but in boasting of New York City's baseball teams winning 27 world championships (now 28), he neglects to recall the five that had been won by the Giants and the one by the Dodgers. Not so good for an outer-borough guy.
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Posted October 11, 2005 It's nice to see the Mets ahead of the Braves in the Most years without a League Championship list. Maybe we've cursed both the Braves & Yankees? Not much of a curse though: "You will always do better than us,getting into the playoffs each year, but you'll never win it all! Mwah-ha-ha-ha!"
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Author Posted October 11, 2005 Another interesting tidbit:There's a 75% chance that at the end of this postseason, we'll see our sixth different World Champion in the last six years. (Unless the Angels prevail.)I'm pretty sure that's unprecedented. And if it happens, we can all root for the Mets to make it seven next year.
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Posted October 11, 2005 1978-1987 is 10 seasons with a different WS champion each year.1978 New York A.L. Los Angeles N.L. 4-21979 Pittsburgh N.L. Baltimore A.L. 4-31980 Philadelphia N.L. Kansas City A.L. 4-21981 Los Angeles N.L. New York A.L. 4-21982 St. Louis N.L. Milwaukee A.L. 4-31983 Baltimore A.L. Philadelphia N.L. 4-11984 Detroit A.L. San Diego N.L. 4-11985 Kansas City A.L. St. Louis N.L. 4-31986 New York N.L. Boston A.L. 4-31987 Minnesota A.L. St. Louis N.L. 4-3That's a great decade for baseball, 13 of 26 teams won a pennant! No wonder why it seemed like every team had a chance when I was a kid.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Author Posted October 11, 2005 Nice going. I had no idea.
Valadius Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Posted October 11, 2005 We're more recent NL Champions than the Braves. That means we're better... or something. In some small way.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Posted October 11, 2005 ]That's a great decade for baseball, 13 of 26 teams won a pennant! No wonder why it seemed like every team had a chance when I was a kid.It's a shame how that new-fangled free agency ruined the competitive balance in MLB. The '50s & '60s on the other hand, now those were egalitarian decades ... oh wait!]Drought watchaka; Who'll Start the Reign?
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted October 11, 2005 Posted October 11, 2005 ]It's a shame how that new-fangled free agency ruined the competitive balance in MLB. I don't think that's the claim. It's hard to argue that the notion of equal opportunity hasn't taken a hard hit since the early nineties.
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Posted October 11, 2005 I think Frayed was referring to the argument made against free agency in the 50's, 60's & 70's. Other factors have upset the competitive balance since then, I believe.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted October 11, 2005 Posted October 11, 2005 ="Edgy DC"]I don't think that's the claim.It was at the time - although admittedly I'm dredging up slogans from an old war here.]It's hard to argue that the notion of equal opportunity hasn't taken a hard hit since the early nineties.No question. But that problem started - beginning with the NYY/MSG deal in the late '80s - when the local TV money exploded but only in certain markets and MLB was too slow (or unwilling, or unable) to reach an agreement on spreading that money more equitably. Instead, they were still operating under the rules from the days when those differences were comparitively small.
Guest mlbaseballtalk Guests Posted October 15, 2005 Posted October 15, 2005 My favorite fact from these rankings is that since the last time the Cubs, White Sox, Indians and Giants last won a World Series (1954) the Angels, Mets, Royals, Bluejays, Marlins and Diamondbacks have all been created and won world championships. With the Mets, Bluejays and Marlins double dipping.Now THAT would be considered annoying if you were fans of the aforementioned teams with droughts!Another great factoid is thinking about that year, and the next and if you want to take a dividing line to those years in terms of dominance of the NL in terms of global popularity, championships and noterity. Look at a list of the championship winners from 1903-1954. Then from 1955...Actually I think the paradigms for the two franchises started to shift back in the early 1940's, but I'm sure 1947 might be a better cut off point in the fates of the premire NL and NYC baseball franchise from 1903-1954, the New York Giants, and that of, despite MLB, FOX and Frank McCourt's best efforts, the one of the premire NL, and even to this day (some 58 years since they last played a home game in the City limits) NYC baseball franchises the Los Angeles DodgersIt truely is a facinating story about how the franchises kind of "changed roles" around that timeSteve
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted October 15, 2005 Posted October 15, 2005 awsum post Yancy.Totally entertaining to browse thru those lists.Thank you sir.Did you create all that,.. is this a CPF exclusive?You get my Riengold Poster Of The Year award dude.
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted October 15, 2005 Posted October 15, 2005 free agency in the 70's may have CREATED parity in the 70's and 80's. that parity clearly left in the 90's and if baseball wants it back it will take 2 years of striking at least to impose a salary cap.
Guest Iubitul Guests Posted October 15, 2005 Posted October 15, 2005 I love the Red Button reference - one of my all time fav's:]Moses, who once said to God, 'Please, stop calling me Charlton', never got a dinner...
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted October 15, 2005 Posted October 15, 2005 Nymr83 wrote:free agency in the 70's may have CREATED parity in the 70's and 80's. that parity clearly left in the 90's and if baseball wants it back it will take 2 years of striking at least to impose a salary cap.......something has to be done.Its a spiral that started upward and outward but has turned inward and downward (as far as the state of the game), imo.I hate to compare it to slavery, the relationship between owners and players, but there are analogies, and I do believe that things were rebalanced at a point and ultimately overcompensated.Players should be paid fairly and what they are worth. They are overpaid. Owners should make money. They have to adjust prices to do it.Its out of control and the players will never concede anything, which, to me, is a problem.Of course, there was a time when the owners would not concede, but we are far past that point.
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted October 15, 2005 Posted October 15, 2005 one thing that alot of people fail to realize is that the MLBPA is not your typical union (nor are baseball owners your typical business owners.) They're both filty rich and when they fight there is nobody to feel bad for but the fans.an NFL style Salary Cap would be great, but i'd settle even for an NBA "soft cap" or greater revenue sharing (with minimum spending on payroll of twice what you're getting mandatory.)The players get more andmore bullshit benefits every time and its bad for the game, but its also realy bad for he game when the owners in Tampa Bay, Kansas City, and elsewhere can get big fat checks for Steinbrenner, Wilpon, and Angelos and still not spend more money on players.We'll probably never have NFL-like parity but we can dream.
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted October 15, 2005 Posted October 15, 2005 Nymr83 wrote: They're both filty rich and when they fight there is nobody to feel bad for but the fans.BINGO!....unfortunately And we love the game so much we really cant do anything about it.We want the games to be played.Maybe we are now the slaves.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted October 16, 2005 Posted October 16, 2005 I'm not sold on the idea that salary caps are a magic elixer in these things.In the words of Rod Serling; "Submitted for your approval":Over the Last 10 years:Champions:MLB = 6 different teams (20% of the league)NFL = 7 (21.9%)NBA = 5 (17.2%)Reaching the Finals:MLB = 11 different teams (36.7%)NFL = 11 (34.4%)NBA = 12 (41.4%) Failed to reach the league semis (league/conference championship):MLB = 12 different teams (40%) NFL = 10 (31.3%)NBA = 10 (34.5%)And over the last 20 years:Different Champions: MLB = 14 (46.7%)NFL = 11 (34.4%)NBA = 6 (20.7%) - that's right, only 6 franchises over 20 seasons!Reached the finals:MLB = 19 (63.3%)NFL = 19 (59.4%)NBA = 15 (51.7%)Did not reach the semis:MLB = 5 (16.7%)NFL = 4 (12.5%)NBA = 6 (20.7%)
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted October 16, 2005 Posted October 16, 2005 "Players should be paid fairly and what they are worth. They are overpaid."They're being paid only what they're being offered by competing employers in an open market -- and even then it takes them a long while before they're allowed to exercise that right. "Owners should make money. They have to adjust prices to do it."And control expenses as well. The old reliable "invisible hand" of supply and demand take care of the prices."Its out of control and the players will never concede anything, which, to me, is a problem." They made some concessions in the last negotiating session."Of course, there was a time when the owners would not concede, but we are far past that point."And while the system is far from perfect, I don't think it's "broken" (see stats in above post). The parties are making (slow) progress and I believe that what's in place now puts the league as a whole in as good a place as it's been in many years.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted October 16, 2005 Posted October 16, 2005 The players made consessions on drug testing and their contract wasn't even up.
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted October 16, 2005 Posted October 16, 2005 This is Kasey Kasem counting down the most years without a League Championship. Moving up 22 spots on the charts to number one, from the Southside, the Chicago White Sox!
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted October 16, 2005 Posted October 16, 2005 I'd hate an NFL-model salary cap.
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted October 16, 2005 Posted October 16, 2005 Yancy Street Gang wrote:There's a 75% chance that at the end of this postseason, we'll see our sixth different World Champion in the last six years. (Unless the Angels prevail.)It's now 100% that we'll see the six different World Champion in six years.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted October 17, 2005 Author Posted October 17, 2005 One of baseball's longest droughts has ended.Most Years Without a League Championship0Chicago White Sox20051Boston Red Sox20041St. Louis Cardinals20042Florida Marlins20032New York Yankees20033Anaheim Angels20023San Francisco Giants20024Arizona Diamondbacks20015New York Mets20006Atlanta Braves19997San Diego Padres19988Cleveland Indians199712Toronto Blue Jays199312Philadelphia Phillies199314Minnesota Twins199115Cincinnati Reds199016Oakland Athletics198917Los Angeles Dodgers198820Kansas City Royals198521Detroit Tigers198422Baltimore Orioles198323Milwaukee Brewers198226Pittsburgh Pirates197960Chicago Cubs1945
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted October 26, 2005 Posted October 26, 2005 Things just got a little dryer in ClevelandMost years without a World Championship0 yearsChicago White Sox20051 yearsBoston Red Sox20042 yearsFlorida Marlins20033 yearsAnaheim Angels20024 yearsArizona Diamondbacks20015 yearsNew York Yankees200010 yearsAtlanta Braves199512 yearsToronto Blue Jays199314 yearsMinnesota Twins199115 yearsCincinnati Reds199016 yearsOakland Athletics198917 yearsLos Angeles Dodgers198819 yearsNew York Mets198620 yearsKansas City Royals198521 yearsDetroit Tigers198422 yearsBaltimore Orioles198323 yearsSt. Louis Cardinals198225 yearsPhiladelphia Phillies198026 yearsPittsburgh Pirates197951 yearsNew York (SF) Giants195457 yearsCleveland Indians194897 yearsChicago Cubs1908Never Won a World Championship8 yearsTampa Bay Devil Rays199713 yearsColorado Rockies199229 yearsSeattle Mariners197637 yearsWashington Nationals (Montreal Expos)196837 yearsSan Diego Padres196837 yearsMilwaukee Brewers (Seattle Pilots)196844 yearsHouston Astros196145 yearsTexas Rangers (Washington Senators)1960Most years without a League Championship0 yearsChicago White Sox20050 yearsHouston Astros20051 yearsBoston Red Sox20041 yearsSt. Louis Cardinals20042 yearsFlorida Marlins20032 yearsNew York Yankees20033 yearsAnaheim Angels20023 yearsSan Francisco Giants20024 yearsArizona Diamondbacks20015 yearsNew York Mets20006 yearsAtlanta Braves19997 yearsSan Diego Padres19988 yearsCleveland Indians199712 yearsToronto Blue Jays199312 yearsPhiladelphia Phillies199314 yearsMinnesota Twins199115 yearsCincinnati Reds199016 yearsOakland Athletics198917 yearsLos Angeles Dodgers198820 yearsKansas City Royals198521 yearsDetroit Tigers198422 yearsBaltimore Orioles198323 yearsMilwaukee Brewers198226 yearsPittsburgh Pirates197960 yearsChicago Cubs1945Never Won a League Championship8 yearsTampa Bay Devil Rays199713 yearsColorado Rockies199229 yearsSeattle Mariners197637 yearsWashington Nationals (Montreal Expos)196845 yearsTexas Rangers (Washington Senators)1960
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.