Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 OK, Loopy & Castro in on another double-switchCastilla - GOSchneider - FOByrd - BBW. Cordero (PH) - FOMets win!!!
Guest Spacemans Bong Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Floyd catches a first pitch flyball in foul ground in left and the Mets win 3/4 against the team with the best home record in baseball. Enormous win for the Mets, and they're above .500.
Guest KC Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 >>>The problem was Piazza rounded first very slowly and came to almost a complete stop<<<He had to stop and wait until the ball was thrown.It's over. Mets take 3 of 4.
Guest Yancy Street Gang Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Officially, that would be a 6-2-9-2-6 double play.
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 And the Metsies are back out of the cellar.
metirish Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 3 outta 4 at the Nats, super stuff.
Guest Yancy Street Gang Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Three of four from the division-leading Nationals.Not too shabby.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Sweet win.It took all of us to win this.Farewell, five hundred!
Elster88 Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Yancy Street Gang wrote:Officially, that would be a 6-2-9-2-6 double play. I don't think so, I think Gameday got it wrong. Didn't Floyd make the last out at the plate? I think it was Guillen straight to the catcher on the fly, to Carroll, back home.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Gameday shows that Cordero foul went pretty deep. Does that hook around the pole in a smaller park?
Guest Rotblatt Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 So here's the question: is this the beginning of the end for the Nationals, the beginning of the Mets' resurgance, both, or neither? Perhaps I'll start a poll . . .
Guest Yancy Street Gang Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 And that's 20 saves for Looper.I don't generally think much of saves, but that's a pretty good total after 85 games.
Elster88 Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Rotblatt wrote:So here's the question: is this the beginning of the end for the Nationals, the beginning of the Mets' resurgance, both, or neither? Perhaps I'll start a poll . . .They're still not hitting. Take away Piazza's three hits and Beltran's two hits and they don't score today.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 9 - 2 - 6 - 2 RBI-1B/DP would be more like it.Bell = WPLoops = SavePiazza = 3 hits (999 as NYM) including game winnerBenson = Good startBeltran = 2 2Bs and game-winning runRest of team = eh
Guest ScarletKnight41 Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 For the third time this season I was in attendance at the one game of a series that the Mets didn't win (although this time I also saw a winner on Monday at least).STFU to the guys selling the Mets Suck shirts on Monday. Who do you think you are talking trash after you've had a major league team for all of 15 minutes?
Elster88 Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 I've seen a lot of angry posts because of those T-shirts. Doesn't really bother me that much. They're excited to have a team is all. They're not allowed to be overly excited about having a team after a few decades? Saying that they can't have t-shirts because they just got a team smacks of Yanqui fans telling Red Sock fans that they only have 18 more championships to catch up.
Guest Spacemans Bong Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Edgy DC wrote:Gameday shows that Cordero foul went pretty deep. Does that hook around the pole in a smaller park?In the Polo Grounds maybe, but it's only 335 down the line in DC, and it was a good 20 feet from the fence. The question was whether it'd go in the stands, not go out.
Guest Spacemans Bong Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 By the way, the Nationals have scored 345 runs this year and allowed 348.I do not expect them to have a good second half. Perhaps they'll defy Pythagoras for the entire second half, but I'd bet against it.
Guest ScarletKnight41 Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 They're not established enough to talk trash. And they've never had a particular rivalry with the Mets.I'm fine with them being excited about having a team after a 35 year absence - go to town. But the should do it by cheering on their own team, not trash talking about mine.Fuck 'em!
Elster88 Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Love the afternoon win, but hate no night game on a weeknight. Let's play two.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Edgy DC wrote:Gameday shows that Cordero foul went pretty deep. Does that hook around the pole in a smaller park?Edgy, IIRC the left field line at RFK is a pretty standard 330' or so.Its in the power alleys and centerfield where fly balls go to die at RFK.There aren't too many ballparks that come to mind with a shorter distance at the foul/ fair pole. Of course, Yankee Stadium is shorter. And Fenway is 315' to the wall, but I don't know if the ball was high enough at that point to clear the Monster, Maybe in the newer parks in Milwaukee, Houston and Cincy it might have had a chance. And I think I read thatthey moved the plate back about 15' in OPACY, so it might not have been a homer there, either.Come to think of it, MLB passed a rule a few years back that any new ballparks had to be a minimun 330' down the line and 400' in center. If any of the newer parks are less than that, it required a waiver from the Commissioner's office.Hope that helped.Later
Elster88 Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 ScarletKnight41 wrote:They're not established enough to talk trash. And they've never had a particular rivalry with the Mets.I'm fine with them being excited about having a team after a 35 year absence - go to town. But the should do it by cheering on their own team, not trash talking about mine.Fuck 'em!I see your point.But I've also seen people (not necessarily you, CookieMom) grumping that they go nuts at every little thing. I see all of this: the trash-talk, the t-shirts, and the cheering a 2-out single when down 8-1 as exuberance at having baseball in town. Considering how many people don't like baseball, I see this as a good thing.
Guest holychicken Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 ]And they've never had a particular rivalry with the Mets.This is what I agree with, not the fact that they haven't been around long.I mean, what have the Mets done to them? Nothing. . . until now.MUAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAH!!!
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 I would really enjoy it if the Mets, Nats and Phillies all got to be good at the same time and a had a good three-city rivalry. [Any Team] Sucks t-shirts are stupid no matter what fans sell/wear them although generally they only attract a small part of the fan base. I found my RFK experience to be cordial, although I wasn't there for SK's run-in. Interestingly, the most hostile I've ever seen opposing fans was in Baltimore back at an interleague game in 1997. Maybe there's a regional distaste for New York teams down there.
Guest ScarletKnight41 Guests Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 The grumbling has come from me, I'm sure.And they can be as stupid as they want - it's their business.It's the trash talk and the sudden MFYesque attitude of entitlement that pissed me off.
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.