Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

Two runs without a ball leaving the IF: K, walk, HBP, muffed come-backer*, 3U + E3 (2 runs), K

* is an easy inning-ending GiDP if he lets it go

Old-Timey Member
Posted
32 minutes ago, Edgy MD said:

AJ Blubaugh on for the Astros.

A longtime favorite of the Camptown ladies.

Shouldn't that be AJ Bluballs?

Posted

Well, Blubaugh is the pitcher of record in the winning side, so whatever color his balls currently are, he's got the drop on me.

But Benji has a real chance 2-and-0 here.

Posted
1 minute ago, Edgy MD said:

Might be a good time to let Pache hit for Ewing.

Also a good idea for Ewing to double into the gap.  That's good too.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Well, the igt god giveth, and the IGT GODS taketh away.

Nice way to end a season.

Posted
1 hour ago, Edgy MD said:

But the NFL doesn't cover, say, a Giants/Patriots game by rolling out Jason Pierre-Paul and Rob Gronkowski or the like, in order to project some sort of broadcast even-handedness?

(It seems awful condescending.)

Well of course every NFL game is done by one of the networks so they all have set teams in place to cover each game. 

I think NBC is just trying something different by using 'local' guys who 'know' the teams involved, maybe because it's been so long since they had a full-time working crew in place. And I didn't mean to imply that the analysts du jour are expected to root for one side, more like they're there to provide semi-insider knowledge. In this case Zeile certainly knows the current Mets. Whether some of these other choices are as connected to the squads they once played for or not probably varies.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
2 minutes ago, kcmets said:

Well, the igt god giveth, and the IGT GODS taketh away.

Nice way to end a season.

I blame Brock. 
the Mets haven’t hit well all season (as FK has documented). But it seems they are particularly bad in the last three innings of games. Are there any numbers to show that?
later

Posted

This kind of stuff is all very lookup-able.

Innings 1 - 3: .228 / .293 / .338 // 631

Innings 4 - 6: .252 / .317 / .409 // 726

Innings 7 - 9: .222 / .301 / .360 // 661

Looks mostly like random variation rather than any kind of predictable pattern.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

If you know what you’re doing. It looks like they’re consistently meh.

thanks

later. 

Posted

The broader reality is that most teams tend to hit their best in the middle innings, when they tend to be facing either a flagging starter or the weakest end of the pen.

Innings 1-3: .242 / .313 / .405 // .718
Innings 4-6: .249 / .320 / .408 // .728
Innings 7-9:  .239 / .319 / .386 // .705

Posted
2 hours ago, Edgy MD said:

Also a good idea for Ewing to double into the gap.  That's good too.

I feel like this is his first XBH in like a month. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...