batmagadanleadoff wrote: Ceetar wrote: That's because it's not hypocrisy. They aren't claiming they're in financial ruin to avoid Picard judgement, they're claiming they're not at fault to the point of not having to be the ones to pay the other victims. Quite different than not having any other money or prospects for improvement. Picard essentially let the Mets off the hook because of their perceived inability to pay a large judgment, not because Picard doubted their culpability. And besides, if the Mets claimed financial ruin, it's a hypocrisy in light of their recent claims to the contrary, no matter what the reason. the financial world is hardly that black and white. claiming, suggesting, or proposing solutions that would keep them from paying much is not that same thing as financial ruin, and the Wilpons have remained pretty steadfast in their claim that they were fine. Plenty of evidence may have suggested, or suggests, that that's not the case, but no one's seen their books either. The Wilpons aren't paying nothing to Picard either, it's not much compared to the numbers they floated, but they probably never expected that much. You ask for the moon and then settle for something less than that. Picard determined that what they agreed to was the best result, for any number of reasons.