It's interesting, you'd think protecting that pick would be against the spirit of the rule. The Pirates didn't finish with the 10 worst records. Look at the Blue Jays for example. 10th pick, protected, but likely to be MUCH better this year. Say they don't like the guys available to them this year, they could push the pick back, and take the 10th pick in a draft year when they finished closer to the top. And it's protected, so they could make the playoffs, be a great team, and still have a protected pick in next year's draft. I'd argue the 10 picks should be protected, but it should skip the Pirates pick. It should be the top 10 picks from 2013, not the carry over.