Frayed Knot wrote: Ceetar wrote: But it's silly to nitpick Collins' words because he just spouts whatever he feels like saying. Actions speak louder and all the actions seem to suggest Collins doesn't realize Lagares is his best outfielder. The Mets have played 43 games to date and Lagares has played in every one he's been available for (missed 13 while on the DL), starting 25 of those 30 and appearing later in the other 5. Argue if you want that skipping the wonderfulness that is Luan Lagares in even one game is some sort of capital offense, but let's not twist this into a Terry=clueless angle, particularly as he needs to juggle 4 OFers into 3 spots. After years of not having enough real outfielders to fill the three spots, I'm happy with the current excess if you want to call it that. It's not an excess. Granderson's sorta been alright after a slow start, Chris Young had a good week somewhere but hasn't really been good otherwise. I've been pretty much accepting of Collins. I know he's not the best but I don't expect the Mets, or most teams, to sign a really good manager. Backman will be much of the same. But there is literally nothing to back up the way he's managed the outfield. Lagares IS their best outfielder. You wouldn't sit Daniel Murphy four games of five, strictly using him as a pinch hitter and maybe defensive replacement during that stretch. Particularly if you're talking about getting starts for a guy with an OPS of .619 or a 40 year old outfielder who's clearly well past his prime. Collins is trying to work Abreu in like he's going to be Marlon Byrd, but just because you win one scratch off doesn't mean the next one will also net you money. Play the guy that's better, younger, and part of the future. And if you want to work Eric Young in because you've got some crazy notion that who bats leadoff is some sort of special power, fine, the other outfielders aren't exactly lighting it up. Don't sit the best on that often, it's just bad strategy.