Edgy MD wrote: Ceetar wrote: good sign. Feels like the older guys were more likely to vote along ignorant morality guidelines. Morality guidelines aren't necessarily ignorant. There are some that are and always have been explicitly part of the criteria that people are asked to vote on. Boo on age prejudice. The BBWAA has provided no shortage of controversies in the micro. In the macro, they almost always get the right men. it's not age prejudice, trust me. Statistics are not opinions, they're facts, and many of these older guys are on record against them, or on record stating they're voting for arbitrary personal reasons. And I KNOW a few of the younger guys (who can't vote yet). I don't trust their opinion more because I'm a fan/friends/agree with them, but because they're more apt to take a logical, fact-based approach. I can't know for certain obviously, as I barely paid attention to the charade last voting cycle since it didn't include Barry Bonds and therefore can't be taken seriously, but of the votes I do know about votes of NAY for Bonds, Bagwell, Piazza, etc are going to be not cast this time which likely means a higher percentage.