d'Kong76 wrote: Ceetar wrote: Mr. small sample size? Yes, and maybe I'm wrong but in other scenarios you'd be the, "meh, it's only 16 games so I'm not going to get my shorts in a knot just yet" guy. I checked and you were indeed against the signing and I'll give you that. On the other hand, I 'Expected' a good season and I'm rooting for that. Not everything in baseball can be explained on a spreadsheet, otherwise they could just run sim games on Watson and not bother wasting 3 1/2 hours everyday playing the actual games. yes, my argument here isn't that Bruce has been meh this season, it's that he's not good, period. I've been against it every time we've signed him. Sure, baseball's not played on a spreadsheet, but the mountains of data certainly strongly inform the idea that Bruce's ceiling is basically league average. At least he has a 13.6 BB% so far this year, but THAT is probably just small sample stuff.