Coobs, I think your granddaughter was right. From 101 DALMATIONS until LITTLE MERMAID, Disney films of the 1960s-80s used a cheaper xerox technology for their animation, and they completely lacked the artistry of the hand-drawn cel animation they employed earlier, from SNOW WHITE through SLEEPING BEAUTY. The later works were feature-length cartoons, while the earlier ones were films. That being said, they could still be entertaining. DALMATIONS has a wonderful Villain that carries it, and JUNGLE BOOK has Baloo and some great songs, but, in my view, ARISTOCATS is just meh. Its story is a mishmash of elements from LADY AND THE TRAMP and DALMATIONS, but with cats. And the whole French Cat thing had been done earlier and better in GAY PUR-EE, which was produced by Chuck Jones, with songs by Harold Arlen and Yip Harburg that were sung by their OZ collaborator, Judy Garland. ARISTOCATS has a very weak villain (the put-upon butler who spends his time fighting with a horse and a dog, for no apparent reason). Also, the Chinese cat stuff is dated (some of the more stereotypical references have been cut out of the DVD in recent years). The score, too, is inconsistent. I do love the swingin' EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE A CAT number, but the rest of the songs are pretty bland. So, for me, the movie's derivative story, low-budget animation and lackluster score make ARISTOCATS one of the weaker Disney films, even among the xerox films of that period. But your mileage may vary, and apparently does. and now i have EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE A CAT stuck in my head. Thanks alot.