if you don't want to think about our 1b situation in `09 at this point, that's fine. It is your right and privilege. But this thread is addressed to those who do. Sure, I'll take that double, too. who wouldn't? that wasn't my point. What i am addressing is whether those folks who (1) demanded we release Delgado because of his awful Apri-June (despite the lack of adequate alternative options), and then (2) wanted us to pick up a $12M option because of his hot July, still feel that he's the $12m man, after 2 weeks of hitting .150. With a team that has probably around $90M committed to a dozen players next year, plus some arbitration eligible players (including Maine and Church, I think), do we really want to commit another $12m to an aging, declining 1bman based on a hot 5-week stretch (no matter how good that stretch was), despite glaring needs elsewhere. And our only 1B options aren't limited to that FA list. There are trades, and there are players in the system. Might we do better with any or a combo of Evans, Murphy, Carp, etc, playing for minimum wage, and spending the $12M on a corner OFer, SPer or reliever(s)? The view that, at least you know what your going to get with Delgado (as expressed above) is one i totally disagree with. I have no idea what we're going to get from Delgado the rest of this year, much less next year. He could revert to his form of April-June, he could have another July spurt, he could continue his boom & bust August... nobody knows what the trajectory is of his season, much less his career, at this point. Age and injury makes him a crapshoot... and a difficult point to make.