Among Mets, Ordonez has to win this one going away over contenders like Flynn, given the offensive context in which he was putting up these numbers, doesn't he? Plus, there's plenty like him-- the Belliards and Cedenos and Santanas and Folis and such. But, of course, we can standardize for that. Career OPS+ Flynn: 57 Ord��ez: 59 Do we give guys like Alex Rios (.227/.265/.348 over 570 PA last year) or Vernon Wells (.218/.248/.412 over 529 PA) "extra credit" for being corner outfielders? It feels like we should. Sure, but they're not career-long strugglers. doug flynn, with a career 4085 plate appearances, rates at -75 offensive runs above replacement, or 7.9 offensive wins above replacement. normalized to 600 pa, that comes out to -11oRAR and -1.16 oWAR per 600 pa season. with teh mets he was -10 oRAR/600pa and -1.08 oWAR/600pa rey ordonez, with a career 3407 pa rates at -50 oRAR or -5.0 oWAR. normalized per 600pa, he's at -8.8 oRAR/600pa and 0.88 oWAR/600pa. however, his one good year with tampa masks his awfulness with the mets. in his 3216 metly pa, he was -58 oRAR. normalized, he's down at -10.8 oRAR/600 and -1.08 oWAR/600 so for his career, rey was a little better. as a met, they were equally horrid, with a slim edge going to rey0 rios was -10 oRAR last year. wells was +2. in 1996, reyes put up a -16 oRAR. in a scant 391 plate appearances. not to be outdone, in '77, flynn logged a -16 oRAR in a meager 333 plate appearances. suck it alex rios! for his career, and using bbref's numbers, rey's glove was worth 0.6 wins more than what his bat cost, leaving him with a career 0.6 WAR..