That Mets Merized post about Posada misses the point. He argues that Posada is a better defender than all the Mets current catching options, and that it's folly for the Mets to turn him away because they are shopping for a better defensive catcher. I would dispute that he would be the best defensive option if he joined the Mets tomorrow, but accepting that argument for argument's sake, the point is that the Mets aren't comparing him to their current options on hand. Rather they are acknowledging the defensive limitations of the house options and are therefore looking for better defenders than they are... and better than than Posada is. If you want to show the Mets' folly don't try to establish the shortcomings of Thole and Paulino. The fans and the management know this (even if they aren't necessarily with you on distant third option Nickeas). You should be comparing Posada to other catchers on the catching market. That's who they rejected Posada in favor of. Moreover, they're clearly looking for value, value, value --- somebody you're buying low for the hint of seasons to come, rather than buying high for the shadow of seasons past. Posada ain't that guy. OE: Moreover, both Posada's agent and the Mets deny that there was ever contact. (Not that they don't have an interest in denying it, true or not).