Frayed Knot wrote: Well, when they play poorly, they're similar. When they excel, they're a little different. Not very different. ID career per/600 ABs -- .242/.334/.434 // 768; 30 2Bs, 1 3B, 25 HRs in 1,711 ML ABs LD career per/600 ABs -- .246/.342/.424 // 766; 27 2Bs, 1 3B, 20 HRs in 1,282 ML ABs That speaks to their career averages but not to the distinctions between how they perform when they excel, when Duda is a better contact hitter who uses the whole field, and Davis is the better pull hitter for power. When they fail, which they both mostly have for two years, we get neither of this, and so, yes, their career averages are similar. Frayed Knot wrote: You also have (theoretically) one fewer hole elsewhere by dealing either/or as opposed to redundancy at one spot with two guys who may both be out of options at this point(?) and will turn 27 & 28 y/o (Lucas is 13 months older) before the season starts. Well, we speak here of not dealing one for the sake of a deal, and encouraging the Mets to hold rather than to take a less-than-advantageous deal that would not plug much of a hole. We do not speak of refusing to deal outright. Frayed Knot wrote: Is the hope that keeping both will light a fire under one or the other really that high (after all - it hasn't worked so far)... They haven't been pitted up against one another for playing time thus far. Frayed Knot wrote: ...to justify burning a roster spot with two guys who essentially have the same strengths and weaknesses. I don't want to dump either one just to dump them, but if I'm Sandy I'm turning over every rock to see what I can find in a SS, a prospect, a pitcher, or even a good bench player in exchange. I do not consider a roster spot given to a capable player to be "burned." Teams tend to carry lefthanded hitting outfielder/firstbaseman types with power on their bench under any circumstances. Many of these guys are former starters who have been downgraded. If Duda breaks camp in the role that Baxter had last year, what's burned?