The late-90s Yanquis run was marked by them consistently playing above their Pythag status with 1997 being the only exception [1996 thru 2001 = +4; -4; +6; +2; +2; +6] And while none of the seasons were outrageously high so the whole thing could simply be written off to random variation, those teams often had a stark two-tiered bullpen system where the 3 or 4 best and most highly paid relievers [usually Rivera, Stanton, Nelson, Mendoza] fronted a pen where the bottom half were minimum wage no-names hired so that George could demonstrate that he retained some control over total team salary. Torre, forced to use what he was given, was good at resting his top guys in games where the Yanx were trailing. If those scrubs pitched well in those games the offense often erased the deficit and he'd go to the top guys to close it out. But when the scrubeenies would blow those deficits into routs the to guys would get the day off, resting up until they were actually needed, and the size of the loss was written off as nothing more than one day of bad headlines in the midst of a dominant season. Cause and Effect, or coincidence? Impossible to prove one way or the other of course, but I remember thinking at the time that those teams seemed particularly susceptible to blowout losses out of proportion to their usual 100-win status.