Over multiple seasons? Howe was disappeared with half his contract remaining (2 years of 4). Mickey, if canned today, would be about the same although only 1.5 of 3 which may or may not fit one's definition of "multiple". Going back to the '90s, none of Green, Torborg, Harrelson, Valentine were kept on to finish their deals, nor was 'Middle of the Night' Willie. I don't remember at this point what percentage of their deals remained when those mid-year changes were made, nor do I recall whether Jerry Manual was let go with terms still remaining or was simply not re-hired. All of which leaves the list of 'recent' NYM managers who finished out their terms of employment as ... Terry Collins, and does someone really want to make the case that, coming off consecutive post-season seasons of 90 & 87 wins, that a mid-season change in 2017 was going to salvage what became a 92-loss season but simply wasn't made in order to save a couple hundred K by an ownership group that had no problem doing just that more often than not? My larger point here being that we sometimes get so caught up in Wilpon-bashing that we find ourselves willing to ignore reality and repeat 'facts' which actually aren't facts at all because it fits a certain narrative and makes us feel better by saying it. We went through this late last summer when Alonso discussions started to surface and several of us just knew that he wouldn't be brought up until, well probably just in the last few weeks, "because that's what the Mets always do". The only problem with that argument is that, starting I think with Reyes now 16 years ago and moving forward from there, we couldn't find a single one of their prospects where that was actually the case. Also, like JCL says, most managers, especially first-timers like Mickey, are among the smaller expenses a club has these days and therefore one of the last places you'd want to look for evidence of them 'cheaping out'. Cot's Contracts lists Mickey's 2018 salary as 850K. Assuming a deal which called for modest raises over this year and next, getting rid of him today would be less than the price of three minimum wage players. It just doesn't add up. They may or may not get rid of MC now or in the near future, but I'd be surprised if his salary is even A factor in the decision and certainly not THE factor, particularly not after they went out this winter and hired a seasoned former manager and installed him as the bench coach, a potential transition which would be more seamless than most if a mid-stream change were to be made.