It wasn't so much about snark than incidental Twitter groupthink that my blog partner wrote about in one of his other gigs. Reporters racing to post the lineup first are wasting their time for a couple of reasons. Not so long ago, �first� meant your competitors had to endure an agonizing day in which you had an exclusive. But the window of exclusivity has gone from a day in print to minutes on the web and seconds on Twitter and Facebook. More fundamentally, reporters playing by these rules are behaving like we still live in what I call The Or World � the vanished era in which I�d pause at the newsstand, scrutinize two front pages and buy one paper or the other. Today we live in The And World, in which I inhale all the news that interests me from as many sources as I want. [...] When it comes to basic information everybody�s going to have, all I care about is that it gets to me. Which individual source put that information into the combined news flow? The question is so unimportant that I�m unlikely to remember the answer five minutes later. Maybe not even five seconds later. When I think of the beat writers and Twitter, I think of the Sunday in L.A. last July when Anson Williams sang the national anthem and every damn one of them Tweeted the same Potsie reference at the same time. That's when I most severely questioned the value of following more than one of them. But if I had to follow just one, it would be Rubin, probably. He's on top of everything and he doesn't annoy me in the process. [thread hijack] I used to get a kick out of the times one of the networks would brag about calling the election or a particular state within an election at 9:32 while the competition didn't do so until 9:37 or whatever, as if that represented some sort of huge gap in journalistic excellence. Of course Florida in 2000 made them not so quick to go that route anymore. OK, back to tracksuit.