batmagadanleadoff wrote: batmagadanleadoff wrote: i find it maddening that baseball "purists" are falling all over themselves trying to defend and protect and reinforce the "human element" of baseball officiating. i'd like to rebrand them "errorists" or "inaccurists" in this regard. Yesterday afternoon I was in my car driving and I put on the "FAN", thinking that perhaps, the station might be carrying the Buffalo game because Strasburg was pitching. Instead, the station was broadcasting its normal programming, which at that moment was Mike Francesca. Mike was browbeating some caller-in who thought that MLB should institute some form of replay. Francesca's argument (harangue, really) against replay was based entirely on the premise that Mike was comfortable with the current state of things. "I'm fine with the way things are" said Mike. And that was that. It was the Mikey Likes It defense. I just remembered Francesca mocking that caller by repeating like three or four times in a row: "Whaddya want? Robots? You want Robots? Robots? Is that what you want?" I heard him , maybe it was the same caller.......Francesa was all belligerent with this one caller who's opening gambit was fuel to Frances'a fire...." I think you're totally wrong on this Mike and I'll tell you why"......" WAS HE SAFE OR OUT....HUH....HUH...YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT....THERE'S NO MECHANISM IN BASEBALL TO CHANGE THE CALL......I'M ASKING YOU, WAS HE SAFE AT FIRST OR OUT?....."ah , Mike , you really think he was safe?"......" WELL WAS HE CALLED SAFE...HUH ....HUH..." It was hilarious...