I have to wonder... will the same questions arise about Mike Piazza two years from now? Or will it all be drowned out by the talk of Sosa, Bonds, and Clemens, who will also each be in their first year of eligibility? Daily News today Voting nowadays has become "the stickiest of wickets," says Tom Haudricourt of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, who has a vote. "The ballot talks about character. You just don't want to think people cheated the game. I don't like the argument that everyone was doing it. I don't think that's true and I'm not sure that's a good excuse for anything." "This is going to be something we wrestle with every year," adds Haudricourt. How voters from the Baseball Writers Association of America cast their ballots this year could also provide a sneak preview of voting on the Class of 2013, which will include Clemens, Barry Bonds and Sammy Sosa, who all have been linked to performance-enhancing drugs. The three were all bigger stars than Palmeiro and Gonzalez. Some voters believe, in the case of Clemens and Bonds, that both would've been Hall of Famers even if their careers had ended before the time they are accused of using performance-enhancers. Both Bonds and Clemens are scheduled to face perjury charges in federal court later this year, and while the general outline of the government's case against Bonds is well-defined, much less is known about what ground the FBI and prosecutors covered in a two-and-a-half-year investigation into whether Clemens lied to Congress when he denied doping. Over the next months, more of that evidence will likely become public, perhaps implicating not just Clemens but other pros. Jason Grimsley and Jose Canseco are known to have testified before the grand jury that indicted Clemens, and other witnesses may have come and gone from the jury room without being seen. Will Palmeiro and Gonzalez get the necessary 75% of votes? One voter, Marc Topkin of the St. Petersburg Times, likens Palmeiro to McGwire, who last year admitted using steroids. "If you base it on McGwire, he's got no shot," Topkin says. McGwire got 23.7% of the vote last year. Gonzalez is "different than Palmeiro, but I don't know how much," Topkin says. "There is now a sub-class of candidates, guys who are associated with it. Some vote for them, some don't." Bagwell's tally could be a window into the future, too. "Are voters apt to deny someone based on perception as opposed to any real documentation?" said one voter, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "If people decide they won't vote for him because they think he used steroids, then that will affect other players going forward, like, say, Mike Piazza (who is eligible in 2013, too)." Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/2011/01/05/2011-01-05_hall_judgment_day.html#ixzz1ABmmxjeK Did he bring up Piazza because he was talking to a NY paper?