I'm in agreement with the awarding points how the poster sees fit. That is the point of a poll, otherwise one poster would just tell us who the player of the game was and who got what points. I take my voting on a game by game basis and always give out 10 points. However, more often than not, I abstain from voting at all if the game is a loss or I simply didn't watch the game. IIRC, the whole idea of the Schaefer voting was supposded to be an improvment on the POTG poll which limited players to only one vote per game, even if there were several key players. In my mind, if we are expanding the voting to 10 points per game distributed through many players, I should be able to give those to any player that in my mind contributed positively to the game. Personally, I remember the times a few years ago when there were just two polls, the POTG poll for wins and the Goat of the Game for losses. Those polls were a lot more fun. I think we're all fairly intelligent baseball fans...Schaefer could be more fun, if posters didn't feel they had to justify their votes. Edit: spelling