LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote: For real. In terms of what it means, club-control-wise... not a whit, right? After all, the Steinbrenners' ownership proportion of the Yankees is a fraction of what the Wilpons own, Met-wise, no? That's probably how the Wilpons would want it. Assuming that no more than 25% of the voting rights are attached to the the 25% ownership stake for sale, then the new investors will, presumably, not have a say-so in any matter that can be resolved by vote. I'd expect the new investors to negotiate for more voting power, given the risk that they would be assuming. This is business as usual, but played out at the top of the pyramid, in Masters of the Universe territory. The Wilpons (and Katz) will try to get as much money as possible from the new investors, while relinquishing as little as they can in exchange. The potential buyers will want as much as they can get while paying as little as possible.