Ceetar wrote: Davidoff might be on to something. The way they handled Reyes in 2004 is super relevant to 2018. He also randomly ascribed other injuries to meddling or mismanagement with absolutely no sourcing. The only actual sourced information is the idea that it's a pressure cooker, the influenced the decision making stuff is the source's opinion, and the rest is Davidoff spin. The other stuff isn't really news. we kinda knew that the Mets meddled with the PR of injuries, always want to control the message and always put the best spin on things. It's generally super easy to see through, but at least it's consistent. I've never understood why I'm suppose to be mad that they try to downplay the devastation of an injury or are super optimistic about how fast a guy will be back. They're heavily incentivized to do so. Well that's Davidoff's thesis right? That the prior injuries are relevant. Check out this quote from the Daily News: Last season, some in baseball wondered and whispered about how the Mets handled their injuries when they lost multiple stars to physical issues. Does that sound familiar? I edited it slightly for effect, but that was written in 2010. http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/mets/carlos-beltran-arthroscopic-surgery-knee-opening-day-new-york-mets-article-1.462470 This was following the 2009 season when the Mets recommended rest and rehab for Beltran's knee. Even after the season ended, they never recommended any further action. (They did, however, whisper about his toughness and shame him for sitting out with a "bruise") Frustrated when the pain returned, Beltran went to his own doctor, got it cleaned out, rested 12 weeks and put the issue behind him for good. We heard rumors from the Mets staff that the knee condition was career-threatening. He saw his own guy then went on to play 7 more years. This is no accident.