="Edgy DC"]Sure you have. You posted as fact the baseless notion that the Mets selected Steve Chilcott over Reggie Jackson in the 1966 draft because Jackson was a black man with the gaul to date a white woman (who apparently was actually a Mexican-American).There was much written about it at the time, and this topic was discussed adequately in other threads. And your responses mayhave convinced me that I was misteken, because, as you pointed out, a majority of the GMs would have picked Chilcot, too. And IIRC, I admitted so at the time. So on that I stand corrected. It is you who is focusing on one incident and turning it iinto a theme of another post. My post in this thread was purely based on a local selection versus not selecting a better player for marketing reasons.But I have also told the story that when Weiss passed over both Luis Taint and Dick Allen in that year's version of the Rule V draft, after they both had excellent seasons in the minors, the reason he gave was that they were "too colorful". Don't forget what the Mets roster was like at that time (1963/64). Don't you think he might have found a spot for either, if not both, of them?And that the Yankees under Weiss were the next to last team to integrate? I'm not making that up either. Or when ElstonHoward came up to the Yankees, Casey Stengel was quoted as saying that "When they finally gave me a N...er, they gave me the one who can't run". Both of those quotes were widely reported, too.It was upon that that I based my opinions. Baseless? Those make a pretty good base IMHO. Where there's smoke there's fire.What is your proof to the contrary?Later