Edgy DC wrote: Well, such a Hall of Fame would have Bucky Dent over Barry Larkin and Deion Sanders over Tony Gwynn. I don't really think a dull personality or a relative paucity of publicity were ever meant to be disqualifier. Of course not. Fame is my personal tie breaker. It is not the only way I judge whether a player should be in the Hall of Fame. After all, it IS the Hall of Fame, not just the Hall of Statistics and IMO a player must be a significant part of the history of the game in the era in which he played. Numbers are a great part of it. But, as you know, there are other official criteria, such as "character". But fame is my unofficial one if I'm still undecided. And in the case of Kaline, other than being the youngest player to lead his league in batting, and then leading his league in doubles one year, he never led his league in any other statistical category. He was to batters what Don Sutton was to pitchers. You'd name the best right fielders in baseball when he played and you came up with Aaron, Clemente, Frank Robinson. Then, after a long pause, it would be "oh, and Kaline, too". And that was when he was still active. To me, that kind of player, an afterthought, is not a Hall of Famer. Don't get me wrong, he was a pretty darn good player. But not a Hall of Famer in my mind. What are your thoughts about Rose leading the voting on ESPN? Later