Defenders of the Batman series will say that it was doing what the comics were doing at the time. Batman wouldn't become the dark brooder the movies and animated series of the 80s and 90s until Frank Miller's "The Dark Knight" came along. I would say Hulk gets a ton of points off for me because of the way the they essentially created their own mythos for the Banner character. Hell, because "Bruce" is a "typical" homosexual name (whatever the hell that means) they changed the name to "David Banner." Which in hindsight probably did give the producers more license to make the show completely brand new, with no real relationship to any thing that ever happened in the comics. Although I believe Stark Industries gets a mention somewhere, but Tony/Iron Man is never mentioned. They did do some backdoor pilots for possible "spinoffs" for other Marvel based characters in the TV movies. The Return of The Incredible Hulk features Donald "Thor" Blake, I have not seen this to tell you much about how "true" they stick to Thor and Thor's mythos. The Trial of The Incredible Hulk (which features a young Michael Imperioli in a small role) does feature Matt "Daredevil" Murdoch and Wilson "Kingpin" Fisk (play by Rhys Davis, who seems a bit short for the role). While the characters do ring true for both Daredevil, (Daredevil's origin story and reason for being is the same as the comics) and Kingpin, the setting and ancillary characters are a bit off. 1) It is clearly not New York City/Hell's Kitchen. Looks like somewhere in the mid-west standing in for mid-town Manhattan in the middle of a lush area. 2) Not only is Murdoch seen to be a more high powered lawyer than his comic counterpart, they flip the sexes of their version of Foggy Nelson (Murdoch's partner) and Karen Page (their secretary). It is good, for a late 80s TV movie especially if you forget the fact that you aren't watching "Daredevil" and "Kingpin" from the comics, but rather this TV show's version of them.