Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

nymr83

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    16,831
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings

New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors

New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources

2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nymr83

  1. based on a very rough weighing in my head of OPS+/ERA+/defense/AB/IP 1 Wright 2 Santana 3 Castillo 4 Beltran 5 Pagan 6 Pelfrey 7 Francoeur 8 Sheffield 9 Murphy 10 Tatis 11 Feliciano 12 Rodriguez 13 Figueroa 14 Maine 15 Misch 16 Redding 17 Santos 18 Delgado 19 Nieve 20 Stokes 21 Hernandez, L. 22 Dessens 23 Church 24 Reyes 25 Sullivan 26 Green 27 Thole 28 Castro 29 Hernandez, A. 30 Takahashi
  2. What The Critics Said "I get paid to give good reviews to high budget films!"
  3. the Yankees have now agreed to terms with 1B/DH Nick Johnson. Johnson will receive roughly 5.5 million dollars for his services.
  4. Benjamin Grimm wrote: Vaccaro is right; it sucks to give cream-of-the-crop money to the cream of an inferior crop. But he's not offering alternatives. Should the Mets cross their fingers and go with Fernando Martinez in left field? Give Daniel Murphy another try? Sign Mark DeRosa and put him in left? Right now they've got nothing! If the season started now, there would be nobody standing in left field. (Don't waste your time telling me that that's not literally true. I know that!) So they have to get someone. They should get the best available player. Among free agents, that appears to be Bay or Holliday, who looks to be more expensive than Bay. The other possibility would be to trade for a left fielder. Are there any left fielders available on the trade market that would be better than Bay or Holliday? And if you make a trade, you're giving up players to get the guy, and if he's good, you're still paying him a lot of money. Although I see the drawbacks, it looks to me like Bay is their best move right now. if the Mets believe next year's free agent crop will be significantly better than this year perhaps they should see who the best player they can sign to a one year deal is, even if they have to pay extra for that one year, so that they don't miss ourt next year Vaccaro might be the best of the NY baseball writers right now
  5. someone in the Post today said the Mets preffered Bay's pull-hitting to Holliday's gap-hitting because of Citi Field. I don't know if he pulled that out of his ass or if the Mets PR machine "leaked" it as justification for not going after the better player
  6. I wouldn't want to touch Wang...I always thought he looked ready to collapse, the magic act is likely over. Ryan Garko was non-tendered, he hits lefties very well and isn't a total lost cause against righties, if he doesnt mind a platoon and PH roll i'd throw wilpon's money at him.
  7. 9/12/09: Mets forge unlikely as hell comeback versus Phillies, from down 8-4 after blowing 4-0 lead. David wins it 10-9 on two-out homer in top of ninth at CBP. Nice antidote to unassisted triple play game, 8/23/09 (whoops, I just mentioned another one). i was there in philly, what a great time
  8. this poll is exhibit A as to why a Reyes injury is pretty deadly
  9. Two? I saw one... Ordonez was beyond terrible for 2.5 years as a Met in this past decade
  10. wow these guys SUCK
  11. we have Burrell?? i need to stop working 13 hour days
  12. i vote for Donkey (Ass) Anus
  13. both situations have their merits, but i'd rather have a top prospect who might become a star than a handful on bench guys and injury-replacements. the mets could have used the latter last year but thats not most years.
  14. the yankees got what they wanted here, they have the money to likely never regret dealing jackson or kennedy, they can buy guys like they might become. arizona, to me, got shafted here. Scherzer is imo the 2nd best player in this deal and 2 years from now may look better than Granderson
  15. i'd love to get Church back.
  16. So the Mets are expected to provide Buffalo with prospects that don't exist? maybe hold off on making the Santana trade so that a few more fans trickle in to the AAA stadium to watch a Kevin Mulvey start? or push some guy at AA even harder to make the AAA club happy?
  17. Frayed Knot wrote: Me don't likey. I neither want Burrell nor am all that hot about getting rid of Castillo. Burrell is a one-dimensional DH on the down-side who's a clear salary dump situation at this point ($9 mil) Bradley is an angry malcontent who's owed even more money and for more time ($9 + $12) Castillo, though limited, plays a middle IF position and is still useful w/the bat and only somewhat overpaid (2 x $6) I don't get what's in it for us. paying burrell less than castillo overall and freeing up 2nd base for Hudson, who i gues will come waaaaaaaay cheaper than any of the outfielders the mets dont want to spring for
  18. can the 2-2-1 format and revert back to 2-3 i dont like 2-3, the wild card or lesser division winner shouldnt get to start with 2 at home.
  19. I'm not going to miss the guy, mediocrity is easy to find and the Mets might as well try to find better upside, even if they just end up with a younger/healthier version of Schneider
  20. he seems to hit lefties pretty well, not a bad move
  21. I don't like Cora (or rather his baseball skills), but he could have easily said "I'm hurt, i'm not playing" and collected his paycheck at a time when the Mets were very short on warm bodies. If this is his "thank you" for being a loyal soldier thats fine, as long it doesnt hurt the budget on getting the help this team really needs.
×
×
  • Create New...