This is where the new rules are killing Bourn. In years past, he could always sign a one-year contract and then try free agency again the following year. But now, with the potential loss of a draft pick, that one-year deal is less attractive to may clubs. The Mets certainly aren't in a position to give up a draft pick for a one-year player; only a team that's very close to being a championship-level club should consider such a thing. The Mets would need at least two, probably three, years from Bourn to make it worthwhile. Maybe the pieces will fall into place; I read today that David Wright has initiated courtship rituals with Bourn, so who knows? If the contract isn't crippling, I'd be okay with losing the pick for three years of Bourn.